Bigs,
Take the numbers for Swifttrade guys and do the math.
You'll find that some guys who make a good living trading under the Swifttrade model would get crushed trading under the Quest deal. However, some guys could improve their income dramatically. Not without risk, but hey....risk/reward is what trading is all about!
These are different deals who cares! Trading at Swifttrade has risks and costs. Since props at Swift only get 30% of their net profit I would say that they pay a price for this received riskless trading. You can think of it as either your commission on every winning trade is 70% of the profit (without any way to mitigate it, the bigger the win the more Peter Beck makes), or or you don't pay commission but, you pay a hell of a lot of interest to use Swifttrade's money (and the better you do the more they want in interest).
I'm not going to turn this into a Quest vs. Swift battle and quite frankly the two are very different cost models. Suffice it to say that I think both firms could have very successful prop. programs. It's just a matter of having the right traders in the right places.
Take the numbers for Swifttrade guys and do the math.
You'll find that some guys who make a good living trading under the Swifttrade model would get crushed trading under the Quest deal. However, some guys could improve their income dramatically. Not without risk, but hey....risk/reward is what trading is all about!
These are different deals who cares! Trading at Swifttrade has risks and costs. Since props at Swift only get 30% of their net profit I would say that they pay a price for this received riskless trading. You can think of it as either your commission on every winning trade is 70% of the profit (without any way to mitigate it, the bigger the win the more Peter Beck makes), or or you don't pay commission but, you pay a hell of a lot of interest to use Swifttrade's money (and the better you do the more they want in interest).
I'm not going to turn this into a Quest vs. Swift battle and quite frankly the two are very different cost models. Suffice it to say that I think both firms could have very successful prop. programs. It's just a matter of having the right traders in the right places.