Questions to Jack Hershey

Quote from ocean5:

What is ''internal'' anyway?:D No,seriously?

Is it FTP FBP IB STICHES HITCH?Then whats the point count them if i`m already in?And what`s the point to count them if by the time i enter it`s already formed?
 
Quote from jack hershey:

I work in a simpler manner than you.

The way to divide deciles into four parts may be easy or a gueass for you but for me there was an involvement in Science.

you may have missed the volatility and overlap tables.

If you do the coding to adjust the region every bar, you will find it requires work. Maybe you have not seen the lines adjusting during the day>

Why are you not agree with the vol lines on the price pane?No need to adjust anything as the lines adjust themselves by their average nature,as the price moves along.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

Every internal except the lateral.

Both boxes are made into one bar, respectively.

This means for trading, you only have translating bars.

At this level of PA trading you fail to have a leading indicator, so insted of lagging, you switch to a leading indicator.

By doing this, then you have advance warning from volume what is going to happen in price.

Price teaches what to throw out in volume.

As you would see if you had the clue to set up a screen to watch markets, All bars begin with a red box bounding them.

A second bar with a red box surrounding it is thrown out.

If you are an efective and efficient trader, you cut back on observations during a bar up to and including all the time that the bar is NOT important. While this is going on you sweep your eyes to follow (what the charts I used to illustrate how my eyes sweep) the values where trend segments will be ending. These are other leading indicator pics that you hang on your display.

As you found out somewhere you are "detailed" oriented and you find it impossible to discover the pieces. Often you just throw them out.

You were "reacting" to TO a while back. It is just an example of your detail orientation.

It is rarely possible for a person to consider the views of others. I am at another pole in that spectrum of views. I deal deductively from principles. So I need to disappear for some kinds of thinkers and all non thinkers.

I suggest "putting the pieces together". It is based on the assumption that a person who is "detail" oriented can easily find the pieces. That did not happen in CW or academia.

The world's orientation to learning to make money is almost totally senseless. I do not see any tidal changes coming soon.
Is this a joke?
 
Quote from tenthousandmen:

Is this a joke?

If you walk into the middle of a ballet without a program, you may find the ballet to be a joke.

For you, reading my stuff would be similar.

To fix your ballet problem you could go to ballet class and get read up on the "pieces" in ballet and learn the routine of famous ballet creators.

As you may have heard, to become a ballerina requires doing practice, routines which put the pieces together and doing rehersals for performances.

As you see ocean 5 do his one liners. you see a person who has a mind and that mind is filled with an assortment of current beliefs that are pasted over older beliefs he has abandoned.

It is not possible to erase.

If you come and sit down in the middle of a performance, just take notes on what surfaces in your mind. You did that.

based on what is in your mind, my post turns out to be something you do not understand and arouses you to take a behavioral action. You write words in a question for your interjection.

Too bad for you.

Look at ocean 5's dance in this thread.

He can't remember the vocabulary I use since English is not his primary language. He does not construct any memory of information in his mind using English.

As I remember he posed about J, P and another unused letter recently when refering to cases.

He does not know what "lateral" means. He does not know what iunternal means.

Some people follow the beliefs of the ET originator.: 10,000hours are required and you get a CW mind.

Ocean5 is concentrating on a shortcut around and bypassing having a fully differentiated mind.

I should write a book called: The Language of the Markets"

The alphabet would have about 17 letters. Words would be formed and the word would define a trend segment or define adjacent bars identities. There would only be 27 words: 7 brief words and 10 full length words and 10 words defining adjacency.

There would be five sentence structures one for each of the interrelated OOE's that unfold in trends.

Can a mind grasp this language of the markets by reading the letters, words, and snetences.? Yes if the following is done:

1. learn the alphabet.
2. Learn how to spell.
3. learn how to read sentences written by the markets.

In a language , a person learns that the parts of speech are determined by the use of the word.

Sp ocean 5 is looking for a shortcut to using the language of the markets. As we see he grunts out forms of anguish because he mind is not differentiated in any way.

Tenthousandmen is a neophyte, good for him.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

If you walk into the middle of a ballet without a program, you may find the ballet to be a joke.

Were ye a ballet, me boy, ye wouldst be Puchinella.

(I will allow a reasonable interval for replies whilst ye illitruts race to Wickedpoedia far the unformation ye needs to appear littrut.)
 
Quote from jack hershey:

this bare unembellished chart was displayed in this thread to show (visually) the starting point of what a person would see looking over my shoulder to see two of my screens.

When is the next point?

Q:Can i use the unembelished chart only to make $1,3K in 9 minutes?
 
Back
Top