Questions to Jack Hershey

ocean5 and jack hershey,

Jack said this, eventhough this is a global public forum:

I am not going to work with ocean 5, period.

Will this escalate further....? Please take this to PM if you are having a disagreement over the time difference with each other.

BenzMercedesSL...pardon the interruption...eventhough you have not posted in this thread for 6 months..

ES

P.S. Why do I have this dark feeling that I am eventually going to need to close this thread and take names? Come on fellahs good moderation is no moderation, behave yoursleves and conduct yourselves as adults....



Quote from ocean5:

Oh,just in time,Jack.I was gonna leave for the binders...Okey,so long,be cool!

Thanks!
More...
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

ocean5 and jack hershey,

Jack said this, eventhough this is a global public forum:

I am not going to work with ocean 5, period.

Will this escalate further....? Please take this to PM if you are having a disagreement over the time difference with each other.

BenzMercedesSL...pardon the interruption...eventhough you have not posted in this thread for 6 months..

ES

P.S. Why do I have this dark feeling that I am eventually going to need to close this thread and take names? Come on fellahs good moderation is no moderation, behave yoursleves and conduct yourselves as adults....
More...

We all know closing a thread leads to its deletion. For those who deal with substantive content instead, be sure to set up an electronic file or make prints. of these queries and the answers many have contributed.

I can understand that you felt the content was about a time difference. Don't reread to check on that. My point of supporting and helping someone is that the person then, contributes to solving local problems. Ocean5 explained that he does not trade what I trade. In your terms I escalated the conversation to terminate any further help since, for me, there is no common ground. I do not expect you to understand this and that, if fact, no escalation was happening.

Your post here is what I call "a proof" of this thread not being moderated. My mistaken concept of moderation is that there is a consideration of substantive content. There is no noderating being done where substantive content is under consideration. Considering substantive content is not a possibility.

Most of the posts in ET that relate to me, are repeated negative posts. The majority subgroup of those posts are posts which are inaccurate. Here you are telling me to complain. At one time I did and it did not have a rational result. I quit doing this kind of house keeping that has no rational response. I didn't get anything near a fair shake. That can't change, since my activities, performance and substantive content production is "outside of the box".

Currently, it has been , again, suggested to me to post performance information. I asked the requestor to scope and bound the way in which he (redduke) thinks his criteria might be met. Maybe his response was deleted before I saw it.

So I'm more tired than ever of <DEL>fucking</DEL> around here.

This is an information thread in a technical venue and specifically TA. When I post here, don't <DEL>fuck<DEL> with my posts.
 
Jack...The majority on these threads and I are on the same team as you. We are all members of this community and we all have a stake in it.

I personally volunteered to this community to moderate it. I find most of my duties spam related but have recently been receiving more complaints...which I have been asking for repeatedly and it seems to be working.

This is the conundrum...Do we want such heavy moderation that we reduce the posts in ET?...We know we do not want spam and that is an easy mechanical moderation duty along with some technology. But do we really want to say that this site is unmoderated because we do not edit content?

As far as you being personally harassed here in ET and your complaints I regret that I did not act upon them when you were hitting that button. I want to get better and do not disagree with some of what you say and can surely understand your feelings on the matter.

And lastly...Jack I do not appreciate you posting profanity in your post directly to me. I must comment upon it as it is my position to and it breaches the rules of conduct.

ES

Quote from jack hershey:

We all know closing a thread leads to its deletion. For those who deal with substantive content instead, be sure to set up an electronic file or make prints. of these queries and the answers many have contributed.

I can understand that you felt the content was about a time difference. Don't reread to check on that. My point of supporting and helping someone is that the person then, contributes to solving local problems. Ocean5 explained that he does not trade what I trade. In your terms I escalated the conversation to terminate any further help since, for me, there is no common ground. I do not expect you to understand this and that, if fact, no escalation was happening.

Your post here is what I call "a proof" of this thread not being moderated. My mistaken concept of moderation is that there is a consideration of substantive content. There is no noderating being done where substantive content is under consideration. Considering substantive content is not a possibility.

Most of the posts in ET that relate to me, are repeated negative posts. The majority subgroup of those posts are posts which are inaccurate. Here you are telling me to complain. At one time I did and it did not have a rational result. I quit doing this kind of house keeping that has no rational response. I didn't get anything near a fair shake. That can't change, since my activities, performance and substantive content production is "outside of the box".

Currently, it has been , again, suggested to me to post performance information. I asked the requestor to scope and bound the way in which he (redduke) thinks his criteria might be met. Maybe his response was deleted before I saw it.

So I'm more tired than ever of <del>fucking</del> around here.

This is an information thread in a technical venue and specifically TA. When I post here, don't <del>fuck</del> with my posts.
More...
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Here is tutorial till you get around to getting your notebooks.
...
More...
Starting from a horizontal line, and moving left to right on the chart feels more natural for mind building.
 
Quote from baro-san:

Starting from a horizontal line, and moving left to right on the chart feels more natural for mind building.
More...

I was unable to get the video to work.

my comment is probably off the wall.

For any mind building, drills are the key. Repeating a task is best.

Both of you are really the best qualified to make suggestions to those who are now getting on with mind building.

I simply cannot insert myself in the learner's position to fathom the unseen he is involved with.

The monstous undertaking of converting from up/down to roght/left is a challenge.

Money is made going from right to left. We all know all new bars appear on the right of a chart and we alwys have about 1/e of the chart blank on the right side. This is where all boundaries are "projected" for future bars to fill in into these annotated containers.

Dominance is the side of the market where money is made. Non dominance is endured to be able to remain on the correct side of the market.

Could someone fill me in on where to put brief vidoes that I could do by using some sort of camera. I see the one posted looks like it could be a camtasia. I have camtasia and tons of past narrated camtasias. I'll be in Napa tues, weds and Thurs this week. I will be in the Tucson office for the open Friday.

For now, our video guy (you may know him as "Skiman" if you do the international ski travel bit) is in recovery.

In our trend monitoring and analysis, the focus is AFTER point 3 and before the FTT (point 1) where overlap begins. All of this is going FROM the right TOWARD the left.

Elsewhere it is being explained why using trendlines does not work. For these people, that is true for them. We frontrun the CW thinking.

The hold/reversal strategy and system runs well ahead of other systems and methods. CW pushes our trading.

The final part of hold is right to left with the herd's increasing volume taking use to a peak just when the price Fails To Traverse from right to left in a trend parallelogram container.

A new trade commences BEFORE any trend lines may be drawn. SO WHAT!!!

The new trend hold begins by the hold GOING FROM RIGHT TO LEFT in the brand new dominant direction.

We use adjacent bars to begin to draw the build up of interlocking fractals.

there are just two horizontal lines in what we do:

first, the bookmark as a ray from the FTT's and ftt's and, second, the zero axis of the volume display.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

I was unable to get the video to work. ...
More...
I hope RCG doesn't mind that I sampled selected slides from his video into an animated gif. From this it can be seen how the annotations are built from the right side of the chart (present) toward the left (past), starting with a vertical line that is gradually sloped to establish the RTL. My original question / suggestion was if it's not more natural to start the annotation from the left of the chart (past) and build it towards the right (present), starting with a horizontal line that is gradually sloped to establish the RTL. This right / left discussion is different form Jack's price moving dominantly from right to left (RTL toward LTL), and non-dominantly left to right.

It may be that the method suggested in the video makes more sense, but I can't see why.

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=3549909>
 

Attachments

My understanding of Jack's method is
A point one must start with an FTT/ftt and build into the future ( start from left and annotate to the right ) taping towards point two, then on to point three, ftt, for the
sequential order of events to take place properly.

Now where is Jack Paddler this evening ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top