Questions to Jack Hershey

Quote from RCG Trader:

You don't get to anyone, you pitiful nutbird:D

Price and Volume relationship at TL, check it out. Been on the front page for years:cool:
and yet it still doesn't work, isn't it funny?
 
Nebuchadnezzar
RCG Trader:

You don't get to anyone, you pitiful nutbird

Price and Volume relationship at TL, check it out. Been on the front page for years
and yet it still doesn't work, isn't it funny?
Somebody's trash is another's treasure.
 
I DON'T trade anyone's method but my own, but I use price and volume. I cannot speak for Jack and have no idea who "todd" is but I have been trading since 1998 and certain price and volume sequences work just the same then as they do now.

You'll have to investigate on your own. Not saying it's easy, but consistent and tradeable sequences are there, each and every day.

Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

the argument you, jack and todd present is silly: " I say that I am making money, therefore it is true".

my argument has more substance: "Check all the charts posted on ET and TL, the annotations on them anticipate what is coming next on the following day based on trader's resolution. Every single one of them including those posted by todd fail to anticipate the correct order of events. Therefore none of you people can correctly identify p1, p2 and p3 on any fractal. The argument that anybody is making money with it is silly.

for years people wanted real time calls from hershey or his herd, it is silly to ask for those when one can simply take the charts posted and degap them, -- the anticipated order of events never follows

therefore none of you assholes make any money

QED
 
Quote from baro-san:

and yet it still doesn't work, isn't it funny?
Somebody's trash is another's treasure. [/QUOTE]lets agree to disa gree on everything except the simple truth of the matter: " If the trader is not capable of identifying where they are in the order of events on their respective trading fractal,- they are not gonna make money"

If you are willing to accept this simple truth a priori , then go find some consecutive charts posted by todd and try to find one where r2r or b2b from the previous day was followed by 2b2r or 2r2b on the next day.

After completing this simple drill, if you are still convinced there may be some treasure in this garbage, then I failed to communicate
 
Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

Somebody's trash is another's treasure.
lets agree to disa gree on everything except the simple truth of the matter: " If the trader is not capable of identifying where they are in the order of events on their respective trading fractal,- they are not gonna make money"

If you are willing to accept this simple truth a priori , then go find some consecutive charts posted by todd and try to find one where r2r or b2b from the previous day was followed by 2b2r or 2r2b on the next day.

After completing this simple drill, if you are still convinced there may be some treasure in this garbage, then I failed to communicate [/B][/QUOTE]the trader annotates his chart with b2b upon the market has reached a certain point in the order of events, what follows does so always and without exception.

If they trader placed the gaussian annotations in the volume pane, he or she knows with certainty what is coming next

there are no guesses no maybe's, the outcome is known in advance

whenever you see b2b annotated correctly, 2b2r will always follow
 
Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

lets agree to disa gree on everything except the simple truth of the matter: " If the trader is not capable of identifying where they are in the order of events on their respective trading fractal,- they are not gonna make money"

If you are willing to accept this simple truth a priori , then go find some consecutive charts posted by todd and try to find one where r2r or b2b from the previous day was followed by 2b2r or 2r2b on the next day.

After completing this simple drill, if you are still convinced there may be some treasure in this garbage, then I failed to communicate
the trader annotates his chart with b2b upon the market has reached a certain point in the order of events, what follows does so always and without exception.

If they trader placed the gaussian annotations in the volume pane, he or she knows with certainty what is coming next

there are no guesses no maybe's, the outcome is known in advance

whenever you see b2b annotated correctly, 2b2r will always follow [/B][/QUOTE]

with that in mind examine todds charts for consistency

and ask yourself

the person claims to be able to do such and such tasks, and yet the charts posted indicate quite the opposite

in fact locate all his charts and see if any b2b's or r2r's were followed by the anticipated market action on the next day
 
Quote from Nebuchadnezzar:

lets agree to disa gree on everything except the simple truth of the matter: " If the trader is not capable of identifying where they are in the order of events on their respective trading fractal,- they are not gonna make money"

If you are willing to accept this simple truth a priori , then go find some consecutive charts posted by todd and try to find one where r2r or b2b from the previous day was followed by 2b2r or 2r2b on the next day.

After completing this simple drill, if you are still convinced there may be some treasure in this garbage, then I failed to communicate
the trader annotates his chart with b2b upon the market has reached a certain point in the order of events, what follows does so always and without exception.

If they trader placed the gaussian annotations in the volume pane, he or she knows with certainty what is coming next

there are no guesses no maybe's, the outcome is known in advance

whenever you see b2b annotated correctly, 2b2r will always follow [/B][/QUOTE]

Enter only @ .75 deciles in the tail.It`s a big secret, i`m telling ya...
 
Back
Top