Questions to Jack Hershey

[MarketMasher]

Sadly, you missed the point. Try to pay better attention. Now, follow.

I just took a walk, jumped 200 feet, and flew in a radius of 3 miles.

I made sure to wear a red cape, so all who looked up would know it was me.

If you were not there to personally witness it, then I suggest you call around to ground control stations, as they very likely picked me up on radar.

I don't have their numbers offhand, so I suggest you do the legwork.

If not, I can only conclude you are too lazy.

Now, you follow?....

 

[jack hershey]

Quote from MarketMasher:

Sadly, you missed the point. Try to pay better attention. Now, follow.

I just took a walk, jumped 200 feet, and flew in a radius of 3 miles.

I made sure to wear a red cape, so all who looked up would know it was me.

If you were not there to personally witness it, then I suggest you call around to ground control stations, as they very likely picked me up on radar.

I don't have their numbers offhand, so I suggest you do the legwork.

If not, I can only conclude you are too lazy.

Now, you follow?....

Even more sadly, you get to do the jump if you don't chicken out.

Look you came up with a shitty example and you didn't know it was shitty.

Do you trade like you don't think?

Why fuck with someone who is not as shitty as you are?

Look up the proofs.

 

[MarketMasher]

Quote from jack hershey:

Even more sadly, you get to do the jump if you don't chicken out.

Look you came up with a shitty example and you didn't know it was shitty.

Do you trade like you don't think?

Why fuck with someone who is not as shitty as you are?

Look up the proofs.

Proofs?

Are you saying you entered an independently verifiable trading contest or something like that?

That's great! Ok - I will apologize when I see proof you won!

 

[ammo]

Quote from MarketMasher:

Sadly, you missed the point. Try to pay better attention. Now, follow.

I just took a walk, jumped 200 feet, and flew in a radius of 3 miles.

I made sure to wear a red cape, so all who looked up would know it was me.

If you were not there to personally witness it, then I suggest you call around to ground control stations, as they very likely picked me up on radar.

I don't have their numbers offhand, so I suggest you do the legwork.

If not, I can only conclude you are too lazy.

Now, you follow?....

language is the bastardization of thought,because jack's ability to turn thoughts into words is probably his weakest skill,add on several jargon condensers,it is hard to understand it the way he explains it,that only disproves his ability to explain,not the setup,now sit in his chair and try to take this handicap and re explain it ad nauseum to his critics,for free,and ya wonder why he bothers,his inability to convert thought into words,is offset by his overabundant charitable nature,i can't do the whatever the initials he calls it,but i've looked at it and it is definetly do able,i've used what i could understand and applied it to reading the market,so thanks jack

 

[MarketMasher]

Quote from ammo:

language is the bastardization of thought,because jack's ability to turn thoughts into words is probably his weakest skill,add on several jargon condensers,it is hard to understand it the way he explains it,that only disproves his ability to explain,not the setup,now sit in his chair and try to take this handicap and re explain it ad nauseum to his critics,for free,and ya wonder why he bothers,his inability to convert thought into words,is offset by his overabundant charitable nature,i can't do the whatever the initials he calls it,but i've looked at it and it is definetly do able,i've used what i could understand and applied it to reading the market,so thanks jack

Are you saying that the grammatical phraseology is akin to Tourette syndrome?

Ok, fine. But that isn't really the point either.

The point is claiming Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction (nukes, specifically) but offering no proof.

No, wait....that's not the point either......

The point is being too lazy to call around to Ground Control!

No, that's not it either.....

Something about making claims... or clams...............

 

[jack hershey]

Quote from hkrahra:

Jack,i got a Q regarding non-dom segments.Do you keep and monitor non-dom segments` indicators within one display or aside?

Ordinarily, I run two screens trurned 90 degrees so they are taller than wide. The right side is empty except for projections for price to fill within these boundaries. I anticipate mostly.

My trading platform is on another computer and screen. It has some leading indicators there, too.

Since I believe the trading fractal must be surrounded by a slower fractal and a faster fractal, there are three interlocking fractals on which Doms and non-doms are seen and annotated.

For leading indicators, which are numerical, I separate Dom and non Dom using "visual" separators. See Don Bright's post where he excludes this technique, apparently.

You can see a lot of my display on posts here (by others who use the same)

This computer is very very separate from my trading stuff. Most of those who are trying to intrude on my equipment come from the "stan" type countires; they fail.

As you see, anyone who is phishing is given the answers to their phishing. Mostly they are too screwed up mentally to process anything and they tell me this is the fact for them.

The most humorous foul ups so far were done by T666. Bow wow is a close 19th so far. Younger screw ups are now passing him.

You may remember some of the "stans" posting in their native scripts. The cultural differences and time zone shift make it very inconvenient.

To put it very simply, the trading does boil down to a one pager. building the mind is apparently the difficult part.

recently I tried to deal with level 2 elsewhere. the OP couldn't follow the drift, either.

 

[ammo]

back in 07 when i 1st came on here he and spyder had a thread explaining it all,did'nt comprehend it then, it was me not the material,archive it,jack's got a lot of stuff on here if you want to dig thru and study it for 6 months it will probably sink in,it didn't appeal to me because i was already years into another style of trading,if you pm the mods ,they can probably find that thread for you ,save you some time ,it was a big one with a lot of ques and answers,not this only notice the dogshit while looking at the flower garden crap that's in all the hershey threads now

 

[MarketMasher]

Quote from ammo:

back in 07 when i 1st came on here he and spyder had a thread explaining it all,did'nt comprehend it then, it was me not the material,archive it,jack's got a lot of stuff on here if you want to dig thru and study it for 6 months it will probably sink in,it didn't appeal to me because i was already years into another style of trading,if you pm the mods ,they can probably find that thread for you ,save you some time ,it was a big one with a lot of ques and answers,not this only notice the dogshit while looking at the flower garden crap that's in all the hershey threads now

Hey, that's fine.

Apologies to Jack Hershey and all his followers.

My point is that I start from the default position when claims are made by anyone (government, businesses, whatever) that the onus is on THEM to prove their claim.

Then it is up to each individual to decide whether said proof was sufficient.

In the case of guys who make consistently huge returns in the market, their names usually end up in a Schwager book or in the buzz of brokerage houses. Sometimes even bad ones end up in the street buzz....

Anyway, that was the point. And since no one can ever give you back your TIME, it is never to be squandered lightly (unless that was your intent) so access claims up front before you spend a lot of it somewhere....

Happy New Year to All - Jack Hershey and followers included.

We all get another year (hopefully - unless the Mayans were right ) to be better than before!

 

[jack hershey]

Quote from MarketMasher:

Proofs?

Are you saying you entered an independently verifiable trading contest or something like that?

That's great! Ok - I will apologize when I see proof you won!

At that time a proof was a print or a set of prints sent directly from one broker to another (hilited usually). Fed Ex was usually used. This was called a third party proof. My 1.7 million dollar net was one of those. the partial fills took 31 pages to hi lite.

My first print on here was claimed to be photoshopped by a guy named Nitro. He doesn't trade any more.

I used to post logic so people could see how ATS's were built. I do not do that anymore. It is beyond the thinking of most programmers, apparently.

In today's culture, most people are like you are. Mentally you are screwed most likely since you do not know how learning works and you do not know how the mind works.

I do know about those things and I, when younger, lectured in a great many fields on cutting edge things.

This apology thing you have thought up. Why bother?

You are incapable of getting you mind to think about things. That is quitte normal.

No one needs to think up apologyness. It is not a part of any picture.

I did enter one contest that had no "cancel out of the contest. The rules didn't work and no one participated. Contests are like research being done. Just more humor.

In todays market it is very easy to make more than the ATR. There are no losses in tradiing today.

 

[MarketMasher]

Quote from jack hershey:



In today's culture, most people are like you are. Mentally you are screwed most likely since you do not know how learning works and you do not know how the mind works.

HEY!! If I cared what you thought, that would really bother me!!