Questions to Jack Hershey

[bwolinsky]

Quote from baro-san:

Believe me: the truth escapes you at the moment. And, I'm not attacking you. Why should I?

Being the noob that you are, handling complicated tasks such as backtesting and opining about topics you have no experience with is the typical Hershey follower.

It's no different. You could put your backtests here, and that would be fine.

You don't have any, instead, choosing to avoid the issue of scientific evidence, basis, and facts, when what you've posited as your argument is no different than telling me about the idea of reincarnation for Hindus.

 

[baro-san]

Quote from bwolinsky:

Being the noob that you are, handling complicated tasks such as backtesting and opining about topics you have no experience with is the typical Hershey follower.

It's no different. You could put your backtests here, and that would be fine.

You don't have any, instead, choosing to avoid the issue of scientific evidence, basis, and facts, when what you've posited as your argument is no different than telling me about the idea of reincarnation for Hindus.

Now, you attacked me, in your usual manner, based on no first hand information, with the arrogance of a mentally limited person. You don't know what you're talking about. You're no savant, just a fixed minded and pretentious wannabe. I won't reply anymore, and my good will to help you open your mind is gone. In life you get, and you'll get, what you deserve. And obviously your remark about Hindus shows once more how you throw words about things you've only superficially heard. So who's obviously the noob?

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from baro-san:

Now, you attacked me, in your usual manner, based on no first hand information, with the arrogance of a mentally limited person. You don't know what you're talking about. You're no savant, just a fixed minded and pretentious wannabe. I won't reply anymore, and my good will to help you open your mind is gone. In life you get, and you'll get, what you deserve. And obviously your remark about Hindus shows once more how you throw words about things you've only superficially heard. So who's obviously the noob?

You are indeed a noob.

Would you like to handle your backtesting logic assumptions now? Or do you want to review thousands of pages that make no point?

Do you have backtests? I have backtests, which puts me further ahead of you, and regardless of whether you think I'm a savant you've proved you don't understand simple logic.

If you want to prove otherwise, paste your code, here, and your backtests, and I will take them at face value.

Until you do, no matter how superficially you think I understand world religions, you are no different than a faith based believer.

You can redeem yourself by posting simple backtests. You said they take 15 minutes and I'll give you an hour.

Till then. Ciao.

 

[ammo]

http://truthdive.com/2011/12/23/forbes-i0-indians-stand-tall-with-mark-zuckerberg-and-lady-gaga.html you go on and on about your immense I Q ,seems the only thing you accomplish is going on and on..on that list there are 10 Indians 29 and under,they probably stfu and applied themselves

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from ammo:

http://truthdive.com/2011/12/23/forbes-i0-indians-stand-tall-with-mark-zuckerberg-and-lady-gaga.html you go on and on about your immense I Q ,seems the only thing you accomplish is going on and on..on that list there are 10 Indians 29 and under,they probably stfu and applied themselves

I don't tend to look at links meant to dissuade me out of my own knowledge of how well I perform in my trading activities.

If you have backtests, I'd love to see them.

Ammo, it's not like I'm asking for something mythical. That you guys claim there's even a backtest that takes 15 minutes to do makes me suspicious, and it should make everyone suspicious. If you don't see it as fact that these backtests don't exist, and I also know that you two, ammo and baro-san, cannot possibly produce them, then I will leave it at drachma.

Myth? Jack Hershey Fraud Method is a myth, and so are the methods he's used to explain them. It's not the pupil, it is the teacher, and the teacher is a fraud insofar as there's no hard data except mine that has anything at all to do with trading.

<b>And that's the point. That's all she wrote.

Note:

Performance Simulations would be necessary to change my mind, and as long as you guys keep avoiding that issue, I will continue to tell you this man is full of nothing but lies and deceit.</b>

 

[ammo]

i dont program i don't test..this has been pointed out..the point being made is that you are full of it,backtest or not ,who gives a rat's ass,,you just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself,quit doing jump n jacks on ET,look at me,over here, me ,me, stfu and get to work,this is a trading site,not daycare,you are beau the boy,become beau the man ,grow up

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from ammo:

i dont program i don't test..this has been pointed out..the point being made is that you are full of it,backtest or not ,who gives a rat's ass,,you just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself,quit doing jump n jacks on ET,look at me,over here, me ,me, stfu and get to work,this is a trading site,not daycare,you are beau the boy,become beau the man ,grow up

Ammo, you have no data to back that up with. You also don't use punctuation or capitalize.

If you'd like to share your data like us adults do, you can certainly reveal whatever it is this man may have taught you.

So come join the rest of us grown ups and we'll tell you what we think of the data. I may be judgmental in that respect, but not when it comes to simple validation.

I'm more annoyed at the immature, childish behavior of followers, but even more annoyed that when I bring up needing to validate third party results through simulations only this shouldn't be too much to ask, but it is for Jack Hershey, and that's how I know he's a fraud.

You may not have been taught the scientific method in gradeschool, so if you don't think what I'm asking is unreasonable it is you sir who are the child.

I'm not asking anything more than I've asked of other mentors. It's too much for Jack, and too much for others to lay out hard data, especially a simple performance summary <b>that adds up, not a fake one.</b>

 

[Rob227]

Quote from bwolinsky:

You are correct, Mr. Nestle.

Have you thought about starting a new cult trading method?

Like Jack Nestle's Wonderful Chocolate Crunch method? Or how about Jack Nestle's Price Volume Obfuscation method? No? Call it something better, like Jack Nestle's NASCAR Racing Method?

Jack Nestle's call for calls method? Yeah, that's better.

LoL!

 

[ammo]

Quote from ammo:

,you can get rid of it on your own or let the market kick it out of you,the wall listens better

 

[bwolinsky]

Quote from ammo:

,you can get rid of it on your own or let the market kick it out of you,the wall listens better

Like how to make $256,625 per day?

Do you have a simulation like that?

No? I'm sure Jack Hershey would be so proud if you started making live calls here.

The proof's on you. Whether or not your infantile ego realizes it, you haven't proven anything other than how inept you are at explaining things, which is exactly like Hershey.

If you want to show something, you can show it, otherwise the notion that I am not any better to talk to than the wall puts the blame squarely on you, when it is I who would love to see some original research by Jack Hershey himself than more obfuscation. If that's what you're into, so be it, but don't think I'm any less wiser for having to ask for things that have practical use, scientific basis, and facts rooted in the realms of reality. You're talking about faith based issues, and without quantitative results, even only backtests, you haven't proven anything other than to perpetuate Jack Hershey's Fraud Method.