Questions to Jack Hershey
- Thread starter BenzMercedesSL
- Start date
Quote from Paddler:
I like his finite math in the ten cases of adjacent bars and case mutation of forming bar. It is actually common to MADA and log more than six lines per 5-min bar. The basic symbols of a forming bar could be SYM, FTP, FBP, Stitch, Hitch, OB, Spike and IBGS. Combine the mutating cases with sentiment change, volume change and the point in fast fractal, you will face few surprises. As someone said, it is in the subtle differences.
You know a little too much for a few posts under your belt...
Who do you work for ?
Where does your intelligence come from ??
What's your mission about ????
How do you feel about agent T28 and have you ever worked alongside him ??????
I work for ET - Central Intelligence, division 3x D-r. So you never knew intelligence was abound on ET ? ... Our mission is a success. It is exactly how we wanted to appear.
hee hee thanks for the posts... great stuff, seriously
I want to pick up on this later when I get back
Quote from TIKITRADER:
You know a little too much for a few posts under your belt...
Who do you work for ?
Where does your intelligence come from ??
What's your mission about ????
How do you feel about agent T28 and have you ever worked alongside him ??????
I work for ET - Central Intelligence, division 3x D-r. So you never knew intelligence was abound on ET ? ... Our mission is a success. It is exactly how we wanted to appear.
hee hee thanks for the posts... great stuff, seriously
I want to pick up on this later when I get back
Nice call, it's sybil. It shows up every weekend.
More often than that!
But it takes near zero effort to get rid of that trash, and all remnants of his/her existence each time he/she comes out to whine.
But it takes near zero effort to get rid of that trash, and all remnants of his/her existence each time he/she comes out to whine.
LOL, you think I am talking nonsense and categorize me as a troll? No wonder you can't undersand why log is personal and why a bar is logged six lines or more.Quote from TIKITRADER:
You know a little too much for a few posts under your belt...
Who do you work for ?
Where does your intelligence come from ??
What's your mission about ????
How do you feel about agent T28 and have you ever worked alongside him ??????
I work for ET - Central Intelligence, division 3x D-r. So you never knew intelligence was abound on ET ? ... Our mission is a success. It is exactly how we wanted to appear.
hee hee thanks for the posts... great stuff, seriously
I want to pick up on this later when I get back
Do not just "read" what the master wrote. Think and question several times over a sufficiently long period. Otherwise, one will easily turn into a frustrated stroll or a numbed daft. The various logs you saw were actually training tools for the master to illustrate his "points" at particular times and our job is to understand the concepts behind the logs and convert (modify) them into personally useful tools. For a bar to take six or more lines to log, I can tell that you have little idea about the cases other than the simple obvious answers from the master. Try harder to see the subtle differences in the PV sequences.
Good luck.
Sybil? Trash? What a fool! LOL
Quote from Paddler:
LOL, you think I am talking nonsense and categorize me as a troll? No wonder you can't undersand why log is personal and why a bar is logged six lines or more.
Do not just "read" what the master wrote. Think and question several times over a sufficiently long period. Otherwise, one will easily turn into a frustrated stroll or a numbed daft. The various logs you saw were actually training tools for the master to illustrate his "points" at particular times and our job is to understand the concepts behind the logs and convert (modify) them into personally useful tools. For a bar to take six or more lines to log, I can tell that you have little idea about the cases other than the simple obvious answers from the master. Try harder to see the subtle differences in the PV sequences.
Good luck.
Sybil? Trash? What a fool! LOL
There is no math here, you juvenile idiot, and tiki is kind of playing both sides some of the time, but I assure you this thread is completely devoid of quantitative logic as Jack does not actually ever give that, and that's part of the charade.
If you classify anything here as math then you probably don't even have a college degree.
Quote from Wide Tailz:
I notice you accumulate many positions on price weakness, "averaging down" as they say, then dump them all when you're in the green. This would explain your high win rate. I found this out myself trading long options, but didn't have the ballz develop the method further.
I went through my trade history and found the largest wins, by far, were when I kept buying as an option depreciated, as long as the underlying sat on a support. Then one day the price would pop and I'd drop. Kachingo.
Just like "use stops", the old "losers average losers" rule was disproved in real trading. The trick is to have the high probability setup. Sounds like you use a volatility and spread input. I had a neat little price pattern based on in-trend reversals, but it only worked in a bull market.
My methods, especially my pairs trading arbitrage trades have been significantly enhanced with the method of price physics.
I've said this in a number of threads and if you don't understand that what I am doing in my trades is not simply because it has moved against me but because you buy dips sell rallies and if you aren't doing that, let's say you trade Hershey fraud method, you won't ever make any significant amounts of money.
I buy on weakness and know that mean reversion is likely, so with the aid of my quantitative measures it is not simply that I've identified weakness but that my pairs also identifies strengths and fades those rallies.
If you are not selling when the market's rising and buying when the markets falling then you can't ever be profitable. Sure you can play momentum the way Jack's Fraud Method does but don't think I do and post backtests just to demonstrate my methods because if your takeaway is that I average down or average up with shorts then you're mistaken about what my indicators which identify prime support and resistance levels are pricing in those pricing anomalies and exploiting them to our fullest advantage.
I'm not buying and averaging down. I buy on weakness because historically it has been shown to be extremely profitable. I hope you understand weakness is a sign that the market has become more undervalued, and vice versa rallies are a sign of strength that the market has become more overvalued and if that doesn't make sense to you I'm sure it will at least to the traders who know how to trade and have seen those pricing patterns for years now.
I'd be interested in hearing what you have right now for your indicators, but I'm sure you haven't backtested them at a portfolio level.
Quote from Paddler:
LOL, you think I am talking nonsense and categorize me as a troll? No wonder you can't undersand why log is personal and why a bar is logged six lines or more.
Do not just "read" what the master wrote. Think and question several times over a sufficiently long period. Otherwise, one will easily turn into a frustrated stroll or a numbed daft. The various logs you saw were actually training tools for the master to illustrate his "points" at particular times and our job is to understand the concepts behind the logs and convert (modify) them into personally useful tools. For a bar to take six or more lines to log, I can tell that you have little idea about the cases other than the simple obvious answers from the master. Try harder to see the subtle differences in the PV sequences.
Good luck.
Sybil? Trash? What a fool! LOL
You speak of the Master with such knowledge... Could it be ...
Is this you Master ?
Is this you , my true Master ???
The joy ... so overwhelming
