Quote from NihabaAshi:
Thanks for the clarification.
Lets talk about your example.
If the trendline of a double top is broken by a WRB and you view it as a hint that a temporary top is in place...
Why would you enter a Short position if this is only a clue (hint)???
Simply, what's your confirmation signal after that WRB to confirm its time to open a Short position???
Thus, if your confirmation is only a trendline break via a WRB...
That's not enough info about the price action to prompt a trade decision.
Mark
Mark,
In the example I mentioned above, I'm using WRB as additional confirmation for trade entry. My basic trade-setup comes from pattern (and/or some other price action analysis). For high-probability trade set-up, you want to have more confluence factors. WRB is serving this purpose here. The WRB is regarded by me as the effort to rise/fall for trade entry. In this context, WRB is not only serving as a confirmation tool, but also a good timing tool.
You mentioned volatility analysis versus volume analysis. I don't understand why you regard volatility analysis is more useful than volume analysis. I'd like to hear more about this point.
Thanks again for insight.
