Quote from EPrado:
The main problem with this "strategy" is you always end up with much bigger positions that are against you. The ones that work right away (which are usually the best trades) end up being tiny compared to the ones that are averaged down and losers.
Then the one trade that never comes back does huge damage to the account.
Like I said...this strategy is a recipe for disaster. I have seen many guys blow out doing it this way.
All it takes is one averaged down trade to keep going against you and you're finished.
With proper entries and position sizing none of these are issues.
Sometimes you might have to wait a while (weeks, months) for the trade to come back up to your target profit, but you should never be in a situation where you run the risk of blowing out. And if you're hedging, then you're still making money on your hedges while you wait for your drawn down position to come back up.
If you do this at the right time (read: you get lucky) you can hold the huge postition that you have from averaging down for a long ride. A portion of my account is from averaging down into weighted ETFs during the 2008 "recession". I held the resulting position, thousands of shares, until mid 2010/early 2011.
Right now, as I mention in my thread in the Journal forum, I am holding 1,800 shares of SPY with an average cost of $132.70. I'm drawn down -$9,000 right now on that position and I have another order to be filled for 1,400 more shares at $124.10. I'm in no danger at all of blowing my account. I'm up a little over $4,000 on a hedge.
My entire strategy is based around the fact that I cannot predict direction. I know price will go down, and I know price will go up, and I know that these don't happen in straight lines, so when price eventually goes in my direction I will make money. I manage risk correctly and I cannot blow out.
Of course, if I
could predict direction, I'd be making much,
much more money. Oh well.