http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080908/bs_nm/ual_dc
Notice the last sentence: "A Bloomberg spokesperson said that since the story was not written by Bloomberg, it was not edited by Bloomberg editors."
So Bloomberg have admitted they post, as news, stories written by 3rd parties - without any fact-checking, source verification, or other principles of accurate reporting.
Doesn't this call into question the integrity of Bloomberg's news service? If any Tom, Dick or Harry working for a 3rd party with Bloomberg access can just post up whatever rubbish he finds searching on google (lol), and Bloomberg will faithfully reproduce it as "news" on the headline service, doesn't this make their headlines a complete joke?
Notice the last sentence: "A Bloomberg spokesperson said that since the story was not written by Bloomberg, it was not edited by Bloomberg editors."
So Bloomberg have admitted they post, as news, stories written by 3rd parties - without any fact-checking, source verification, or other principles of accurate reporting.
Doesn't this call into question the integrity of Bloomberg's news service? If any Tom, Dick or Harry working for a 3rd party with Bloomberg access can just post up whatever rubbish he finds searching on google (lol), and Bloomberg will faithfully reproduce it as "news" on the headline service, doesn't this make their headlines a complete joke?