Question to Elite Traders

Yeah. Both profits (if test shows a success) or avoid losses (if test shows failure). I guess

Daily and 4-hourly respectively.
If you found a system that works on daily time frame and it's not a fluke then it should work on 4 hourly time frame.
 
If you found a system that works on daily time frame and it's not a fluke then it should work on 4 hourly time frame.
I have decided to paper trade it for 50 trades for testing purposes.
 
What broker do you use for testing?
I'm paper trading before committing any real $$. I am not a tech-savvy person so I will forward-test the strategy to see if it works. I'm the typical retail trader everyone talks about.

I don't want to assume that just because I make money with it on the daily time-frame, that I will also succeed in the 4hr (more noise, more fees).
 
I'm paper trading before committing any real $$. I am not a tech-savvy person so I will forward-test the strategy to see if it works. I'm the typical retail trader everyone talks about.

I don't want to assume that just because I make money with it on the daily time-frame, that I will also succeed in the 4hr (more noise, more fees).
You should be able to back test your strategy using daily prices.
 
staring at the same chart/market for months, waiting for a trading setup
starring at ES futures alllll day waiting for setup and forcing bad trades.
Got me a special little column in my handy dandy error log Titled just for those special little "Made Up Trades" that try to sprout like freakin' weeds all over the money patch. Little Bastards, lol.

Cash Lure.jpg
 
I have decided to paper trade it for 50 trades for testing purposes.
Are you using a Purely Systematic method to determine your entry stop target exit prices and position sizes? eg. "written" instructions that are executed for each and every occurance of requirements for a "Trade". They can be written for digital execution if you can, or they can be written with a pencil on paper, either way, can your system be reduced to writing?
 
I'm glad some of the first responses talk about back and forward testing. It's absolutely critical. I would only add that you should spend the painstaking hours verifying the back testing results trade by trade. It sucks, and it takes a lot of time, but you need every bit of confidence you can find to bid or offer without any hesitation. Trade Ideas is notorious for overstating back test results. Consider yourself an unbiased tight assed auditor and verify them. A 90% win rate on TI is more like 60%. 99% is more like 75%. I've said it before, but there is an empty bottle of Cabernet on my desk as a reminder of how many times my friends were out partying, and I was at my desk verifying test results on a Saturday night. Good trading, my friend.
 
I have decided to paper trade it for 50 trades for testing purposes.

50 trades is not a large enough sample. I once, backtested an extremely profitable strategy, I though, I went thru 118 trades. Thought it must work somehow. With the huge slippage in prices in actual trading, that was enough to render the trading strategy, a huge failure. You probably, need atleast, 500 trades.
 
Back
Top