Hi,
I like to trade ATM Debit spreads for directional plays, usually 0DTE. Often within the first couple of hours I can be well onside in the trade and I have a dilemma. There is still enough extrinsic premium in the short leg to mean I am not at max profit on the trade and the risk:reward just doesnt play out if I'm closing debit spreads before i've realised most of the potential profit.
But on the flip side, sitting on a profitable position that could just reverse doesn't seem optimal.
So I see I have a few options:
1/ Assuming i'm in a profitable call debit spread I can buy a put spread as a hedge, but that changes the trade and costs premium.
2/ Just leave the trade and let the odds play out.
3/ Sell my short call thats in the money and roll it up. This will bring in more credit lowering my cost basis and if the market turns I can roll this down. If the trade carries on going up I get a bigger winner from the additional extrinsic value I sold.
I've been around trading long enough to know there are no perfect answers but 3 does seem to make intuitive sense and I often do it, but is there a reason why statistically this is flawed/positive in the long run?
Thanks
I like to trade ATM Debit spreads for directional plays, usually 0DTE. Often within the first couple of hours I can be well onside in the trade and I have a dilemma. There is still enough extrinsic premium in the short leg to mean I am not at max profit on the trade and the risk:reward just doesnt play out if I'm closing debit spreads before i've realised most of the potential profit.
But on the flip side, sitting on a profitable position that could just reverse doesn't seem optimal.
So I see I have a few options:
1/ Assuming i'm in a profitable call debit spread I can buy a put spread as a hedge, but that changes the trade and costs premium.
2/ Just leave the trade and let the odds play out.
3/ Sell my short call thats in the money and roll it up. This will bring in more credit lowering my cost basis and if the market turns I can roll this down. If the trade carries on going up I get a bigger winner from the additional extrinsic value I sold.
I've been around trading long enough to know there are no perfect answers but 3 does seem to make intuitive sense and I often do it, but is there a reason why statistically this is flawed/positive in the long run?
Thanks