It is, isn't it?
Probably more than compensated for by the numbers of those who will come back. The fact that Mark is interested in starting threads again is reason enough to move forward with it.
You sound anxious. As a sponsor who teaches a spread trading system, I have been filleted and grilled and gang banged nine ways from Sunday.I agree about WRB --he is very reasonable and experienced. But if he will attract enough readers opposed to the numbers who leave is doubtful. surf
Hmmm. Ok, let me see. The thread starter has the power to silence anyone that participates in the thread that he doesn't like. If that's not called a conflict of interest, I don't know what is.
You sound anxious. As a sponsor who teaches a spread trading system, I have been filleted and grilled and gang banged nine ways from Sunday.
Grow a thicker skin. Accept the fact that disagreement is as likely as agreement. Maybe be more constructive and thoughtful with your posts. Just saying.
I don't like this - it sets a bad precedence and is the exact opposite of ignore. If the thread starter can ignore people per thread then that's fine - but absolutely not cool if the thread starter can control how other people ignore a poster.
I completely agree with the first paragraph and know you have been hammered relentlessly.
Im not calling for self motivation and the stomping out of posters on my threads who trash me. I welcome it. I have a thick skin--
Basically, whenever the price action folks are presented with questions and observations that reveal what they are preaching is fanciful thinking, they complain, run and hide. That is the reason it keeps getting hanmered back on them.
They speak from a throne of authority without the first iota that it is deserved---
And you run and hide whenever anyone presses you about the meaning of "price drivers". Don't be a drama queen.
So is your farewell tour going to last longer than Barbra Streisand's? Or have you decide to stick around?