yeah, Rufus, that makes the most sense - it is an auction game.Quote from rufus_4000:
The simple answer is that because this is how the hedge fund industry works. If you won't do it at 2/20 (which, is already a bit on the high side for a $100M block), the next person with a similar strategy and return will, it is that simple. There is never any concept of "fairness", just a standard auction market, that's all. Price is determined exactly by how much the market is willing to pay. In fact, for a startup hedge fund a bit desparate for investors, it is fairly common for the institution investors to push it to 1/15 or even lower (.5 / 15), because in that case the institutions will have all the negotiating leverage.
Naturally, top hedge funds can impose their own pricing due to high demand and little supply (capacity issues), so SAC charges I believe a (0 / 50), etc.
In a way, this is exactly like trading or playing poker, everyone would squeeze the "fresh meat". It is how the industry works, no one is in it for charity.
people are willing to do more and more for less and less.
as a member mentioned, even if you have a $1m or $5m trading account, no way you can make $2m just for showing up (2% manager fee).
and if you have a $1b fund, your cut is $20m on Jan. 1st.
well, I'm just gonna have to think things over, because I know how rich people always think they got the advantage but in the market, things equal out.
so let them lose their money having traders with inferior systems trade it. after all, there's no guarantees for investors subscribing to a hedge fund.
I know one thing - I'd NEVER - NEVER NEVER NEVER give some rich sonovabitches more than 10% a year - NEVER.
Even if I could make 500%.
that would be a sin.
others want to do that, they can go for it.
I have principles.
yeah, so sure, I'll take 2% and as much of the profit as I can (with supply/demand, more money should go to the better consistent traders) for farting around in the forex at the tune of 10% a year.
yeah, no problemo, assay.
theskalper
