Question for moderator Joe

[hapaboy]

Apparently the alcoholic pedophile troll is complaining to the powers-that-be that its feelings are being hurt because certain ET members are daring to criticize it for its disgusting posts, including pedophilia.

As a result, moderator Joe has threatened via PM to ban those who even respond to the pedophile troll!

Joe, if you're going to ignore repeated requests to at least warn the troll to cease such posts, and have instead decided to allow the sick creature to post about the rape of children, shouldn't you at least allow those who disagree that child rape is okay to voice their opinions?

Is that not reasonable?

Or are you going to go on the record here and state that, here on ET, a pedophile-defending troll has greater rights than those who oppose its views?

 

[hapaboy]

Quote from hapaboy:

Apparently the alcoholic pedophile troll is complaining to the powers-that-be that its feelings are being hurt because certain ET members are daring to criticize it for its disgusting posts, including pedophilia.

As a result, moderator Joe has threatened via PM to ban those who even respond to the pedophile troll!

Joe, if you're going to ignore repeated requests to at least warn the troll to cease such posts, and have instead decided to allow the sick creature to post about the rape of children, shouldn't you at least allow those who disagree that child rape is okay to voice their opinions?

Is that not reasonable?

Or are you going to go on the record here and state that, here on ET, a pedophile-defending troll has greater rights than those who oppose its views?

 

[hapaboy]

Joe the "fair," "objective" moderator:

Joe wrote on 03-20-09 05:19 PM:
Your sick, stop sending me PM's. Keep off his threads and responding to his comments.

hapaboy wrote on 03-18-09 10:18 AM:
When are you going to take action against Zzz, Joe?

Do you warn him to STOP threads about pedophilia?

Do you warn him about posting comments about my children being raped, which are seen by other ET members like MomO, and then deleting them?

Why have you ignored my messages to you over the past week YET, as soon as I post on a thread about pedophilia started by the sick motherfucker who has posted many times about my children being raped - you send me a message at light speed?

C'mon, it's just the two of us talking here, man: Admit you're on his side. Just admit it.

Joe wrote on 03-18-09 06:03 AM:
Stop posting on Zzz's threads! I can't make it any clearer.

Hey Joe, why won't you even warn the troll to cease starting threads about pedophilia when everyone here knows it's simply to bait and antagonize?

Seems only fair that if you're going to allow the troll to spew its vitriol unhindered, you should at least allow those who oppose the troll and its defense of pedophilia, among other things, to also post unhindered.

Too funny, the troll needs to cower behind the moderator's skirt like a toddler.

Where have we seen this act before?

resinate redux

 

[hapaboy]

Quote from traderNik:

I'd love to respond to this, but Joe has informed me that the thread starter has requested that

1. I am forbidden from responding to any post made by the thread starter

2. Furthermore, I am actually forbidden from even mentioning the thread starter by name.

Joe has told me that my posts are destructive to ET.

Not sure how the circus of multi-alias nonsense occurring in every forum on the site is 'constructive', but hey, what the fuck do I know

Quote from Joe:

Yes, this is correct. Get off this thread and any future threads.

http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=158108

Wow, complete and utter verification that the resident troll is being protected by Joe.

One must wonder what favors have been exchanged to consumate this unholy alliance.

 

[hughb]

I just realized that you have about a 1/2 dozen peodphilia threads going right now. Go get some help dude, you got a problem that Joe can't help you with.

 

[hapaboy]

Quote from hughb:

I just realized that you have about a 1/2 dozen peodphilia threads going right now. Go get some help dude, you got a problem that Joe can't help you with.

I just realized you're very dumb.

 

[hapaboy]

Quote from hapaboy:

Hey Joe, why won't you even warn the troll to cease starting threads about pedophilia when everyone here knows it's simply to bait and antagonize?

Seems only fair that if you're going to allow the troll to spew its vitriol unhindered, you should at least allow those who oppose the troll and its defense of pedophilia, among other things, to also post unhindered.

Too funny, the troll needs to cower behind the moderator's skirt like a toddler.

Where have we seen this act before?

resinate redux

Joe wrote on 04-01-09 04:12 PM:
I thought it was clear, no Zzzz.

You were banned today, if you mention Zzz again you will be banned for a longer period of time, next is a 48 hour ban.

Joe

--------------------------

More displays of objectivity from the troll's bodyguard, oops, I mean "moderator."

 

[Thunderdog]

Those glass houses are really something, aren't they, hapless?

 

[hapaboy]

Quote from Thunderdog:

Those glass houses are really something, aren't they, hapless?

Coming from you, this is classic!!

I'm merely asking that the troll not be able to post anything about pedophilia. You, on the other hand, started a thread demanding the troll be banned and claimed its pedophilia posts were the main reason you had done so:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=114611&perpage=20&pagenumber=1

You're such a self-righteous POS. But you knew that already...

 

[IShopAtPublix]

FYI Joe is not a moderator. He is an admin. I have been on forums where you actually PAY to post and people got banned there for nothing. So you are actually being treated with kid gloves considering the admin can kick you out for any reason he wishes.

Realistically, proliferation of threads discussing pedophilia cannot be good for this site. I cannot say I saw threads that started it all so I cannot render my judgment on this subject.