Let's say I have $100 on my broker's account. There is some asset that costs $100 per one unit. I'd like to sell four deep OTM puts with a strike price of $50. Currently, I can do it, no problem, because the market situation is calm. I see in my account that my purchasing power is over $600.
Suppose we have a significant crisis and the asset price drops to, say, $41 per unit. There are still several months before the expiry date of the options. Due to the volatility spike, the price of each option is $9 + some enormous premium. I still have $100 cash in my account plus the small premium collected previously.
Will the broker allow all my options to live and be exercised? Or will some of them be forcibly bought back with a significant loss? In other words, is it acceptable to have a 2:1 leverage during a notable crisis?
My logic is as follows. Let's say the price of an asset drops from $100 to $50. It is a once-in-a-lifetime sale, and I should buy it. Even if the price drops to $40, I'll have temporary 40% paper losses, but it's OK. I hope that the crisis will end someday, and the price of the asset will go up. In such a situation, I would buy with 2:1 leverage if allowed.
However, if the price drops to $30 and below, it means a different situation. Probably paper wealth no longer matters. For example, it could be total war and anarchy. In such a case, I would not be upset if the broker forcibly liquidates my positions. Even if my account net worth drops to zero, it's OK. Only my shooting skills will matter.
I did not observe the situation in 2006-2008, as well as February-March 2020. I don't know how much the margin requirements grow in such cases. Is it acceptable to have a 2:1 leverage during such a crisis?
Suppose we have a significant crisis and the asset price drops to, say, $41 per unit. There are still several months before the expiry date of the options. Due to the volatility spike, the price of each option is $9 + some enormous premium. I still have $100 cash in my account plus the small premium collected previously.
Will the broker allow all my options to live and be exercised? Or will some of them be forcibly bought back with a significant loss? In other words, is it acceptable to have a 2:1 leverage during a notable crisis?
My logic is as follows. Let's say the price of an asset drops from $100 to $50. It is a once-in-a-lifetime sale, and I should buy it. Even if the price drops to $40, I'll have temporary 40% paper losses, but it's OK. I hope that the crisis will end someday, and the price of the asset will go up. In such a situation, I would buy with 2:1 leverage if allowed.
However, if the price drops to $30 and below, it means a different situation. Probably paper wealth no longer matters. For example, it could be total war and anarchy. In such a case, I would not be upset if the broker forcibly liquidates my positions. Even if my account net worth drops to zero, it's OK. Only my shooting skills will matter.
I did not observe the situation in 2006-2008, as well as February-March 2020. I don't know how much the margin requirements grow in such cases. Is it acceptable to have a 2:1 leverage during such a crisis?