You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
question about swift trading
- Thread starter bighitter1
- Start date
Quote from jj90:
Despite what the label and the history books will say, China has never been communist and (I will take heat for this) never will be communist.
Why don't you try and form an alternative to the Communist Party and demand free elections. Then you'll see just how free China is.
Quote from Szeven:
I have decided now that stylelad's posts look fishy. You have been given names and there are names on this board in other places. If you were seriously and not operating on some hidden motive trying to get people to name names, you would already be making higher %.
Body! R u crazy? What secret motive I'm traying to get?? Just the words like "working for 10% = savery" etc. annoy me...THERE IS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR US!! The point was: if we r so "stupid", just name me at least one company that provides worldwide remote prop trading...THATS IT, man!
well I gave you a name ...Quote from stylelad:
Body! R u crazy? What secret motive I'm traying to get?? Just the words like "working for 10% = savery" etc. annoy me...THERE IS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR US!! The point was: if we r so "stupid", just name me at least one company that provides worldwide remote prop trading...THATS IT, man!
I´ve been wondering lately wether a two party "democrazy" is any better than a single Commmunist Party...Quote from Red_Ink_inc:
Why don't you try and form an alternative to the Communist Party and demand free elections. Then you'll see just how free China is.
having the chance to choose between two "Skull and Bones" Azzholes is not freedom.
Straight off wikipedia :
"Communism is an ideology that seeks to establish a classless, stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the means of production. It can be classified as a branch of the broader socialist movement."
Keywords in there are classless and common ownership. That is the anti thesis of the Chinese Commnunist Party. What you really see is feudalism changing forms. Never in chinese history will you see the higher classes in chinese society giving up their privileges or reforming the system to benefit the nation/people over themselves. Those in power use their power to stay in power. Take a look at the CCP vs ordinary citizen. Have a look at the mansions by the waterfront in large cities where Party officals stay vs the straw and brick shacks that the lower class lives in. To think that communism will ever exist in a meritocracy culture based off how much wealth one has is a folly.
"Communism is an ideology that seeks to establish a classless, stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the means of production. It can be classified as a branch of the broader socialist movement."
Keywords in there are classless and common ownership. That is the anti thesis of the Chinese Commnunist Party. What you really see is feudalism changing forms. Never in chinese history will you see the higher classes in chinese society giving up their privileges or reforming the system to benefit the nation/people over themselves. Those in power use their power to stay in power. Take a look at the CCP vs ordinary citizen. Have a look at the mansions by the waterfront in large cities where Party officals stay vs the straw and brick shacks that the lower class lives in. To think that communism will ever exist in a meritocracy culture based off how much wealth one has is a folly.
Well, by that argument we´ll come to realize that there has never been such a thing as communism. Since the same problems where common in all countries from the soviet block.Quote from jj90:
Straight off wikipedia :
"Communism is an ideology that seeks to establish a classless, stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the means of production. It can be classified as a branch of the broader socialist movement."
Keywords in there are classless and common ownership. That is the anti thesis of the Chinese Commnunist Party. What you really see is feudalism changing forms. Never in chinese history will you see the higher classes in chinese society giving up their privileges or reforming the system to benefit the nation/people over themselves. Those in power use their power to stay in power. Take a look at the CCP vs ordinary citizen. Have a look at the mansions by the waterfront in large cities where Party officals stay vs the straw and brick shacks that the lower class lives in. To think that communism will ever exist in a meritocracy culture based off how much wealth one has is a folly.
Communism doesnt requiere countries to stablich a classless nation. It simply requiers them to seek such a nation... just in the same way that capitalist countries are not requiered to have a free market, or fair and representative governments, they just have to seek such things.
The problem lies in that you can seek something forever, if you have no intention of finding it.