Visually, it is much easier for humans to interpret a line chart though. Our visual processing is optimized for lines and shapes.... Not dots.
Depends on the human, I suppose. It's just a graphic form of T&S.
Visually, it is much easier for humans to interpret a line chart though. Our visual processing is optimized for lines and shapes.... Not dots.
To make sense of a dot chart out minds have to go through a process of connecting the dots to detect if there is a pattern in the dots. Even if we are not looking for a pattern, our mind will still try to find one. It always tries to find patterns. Lines to represent trends, choppy price ranging as it bottoms or tops, etc...
Using lines skips the entire need to process the dots into shape patterns. Of course, not everyone is a visual thinker. I am extremely slanted toward the visual.
That is a nice simple way to explain it. ---I am curious about what is going on behind a spike.---
![]()
Oh, and to the OP...
Why does it matter? Big seller panicked or stops got hit because the market started to drop... Market got shellshocked, started chopping as it found support, and then moved higher.
Either a big long position panicked, stop cluster got hit, or someone tried to spook the market to accumulate at good prices... The bottom line is... That scenario would have played out pretty much the exact same way in any of those cases. Knowing "why" it happened wouldn't help your trading results that day, so I don't see the point.
In my opinion it was either a big long position, or a stop cluster. Odds toward stop cluster IMO.
---I am curious about what is going on behind a spike.---
![]()