Quote from OPTIONAL777:
That would be the rule of law that you get from Wikipedia, right?
Bwaaahaaahaaaaaaaa.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution
exactly - you commies.
Aaaabamaaloonama....
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
That would be the rule of law that you get from Wikipedia, right?
Bwaaahaaahaaaaaaaa.....
Quote from Wallet:
Both sides are just as quick to point an accusing finger, the left has tried to attack the prior administration on several points of law, but it's their blindness to their own side that's troubling.
I pose the question, if a President sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution, was found to be deliberately conspiring to withhold information and perjuring.... what should be done?
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
If Bush and Cheney knowingly went to war on the basis of false pretense, what should have been done, and what should be done now?
How about we clear up all the ifs and buts on that one before proceeding to Obama...
Quote from Wallet:
If someone deliberately lied and gave false information that promoted the action then go after the person who lied... but Bush and Cheney with the Senate and House all agreed on the action. to blame only part is in err.
Now answer about your President
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
You have your answer about Obama, there are no complaints by those who actually matter...
Quote from jem:
Those who matter are the citizens followed by the constitution.
I could give shit what hillary thinks.
In fact she may know that some states will require Obama to prove he is a natural born citizen.
It will then be her chance for 8 years.
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Yes, my answer.
The courts, the electoral college, the state of Hawaii election commission, the congress are on one side...and yall birthers are on the other...