So, where is your contribution besides questioning peoples claims? I am happy to walk you through a number of the most often used interest rate models because I think thats what most quants work with/on in the fixed income arena. I can speak less about the equity side but I highly doubt anyone looks at some indicators or most common used technical analysis. We can debate for an eternity what you and I mean about TA or quant but why cant we settle on the most common usuage and meaning of TA and quants? I think TA for most means the investigation of past prices and deriving certain conclusions that are supposed to guide in the discovery of future price levels. This I dont think any quant in any of the sell-side firms does!!! As an aside note, there are CTAs at sell-side firms that use TAs but quants generally dont bother with any past price action.
Quote from traderNik:
Why is it that this just seems... less than likely to me? : )
Hmmm.. it seems that a few people in here have somehow come to believe that all 'quants' use things like RSI, MACD, etc.
Of course there are 'quants' who use technical analysis. The only people who might doubt this are those who think that RSI, MACD and the like encompass all of technical analysis. Of course all of what quants do probably isn't TA, but that doesn't mean that some of it isn't TA.
In the end, quants are attempting to do what? Quantify.
:eek: