Quadriga Superfund - Managed Futures

Quote from Ebo:

That number was based on The NAV at the the end of September 2003 through last Thursday. I do not need to defend the Funds performance, I am merely reporting the numbers I have on my E mail from them.

There indeed seems to be some confusion about the difference in performance between The GCT, QSF-B, and QSF Offshore B fund.

ebo
More...
I'm looking on the Quadriga website, and none of the funds' performance for the period in question approaches the figure you provided. I wonder if you could cross-reference the returns in your emails with the returns on the site to determine where the source of the discrepancy lies? TIA!

jj
 
My E mails are from Quadriga to partners of the fund and I am not posting their contents on here. They are not public information. I obtained that result by subtracting the difference in NAV between the current NAV and the NAV on 10/1/2003 and divided accordingly.

Here is the link of the "funds" audited information.
http://www.superfund.net/

I know you are a CTA for a competing fund and I do not need continue this. I fully understand your M.O.

Phone (212) 750-6300
Toll free 1.888.50.SUPER
email: nyc@quadrigafund.com


Have a nice day.
 
one year rolling 13.89 %


Close but not 25%, and not enough for me to Jump up and Down and pull trading money out and pile it into Quadriga...But Quadriga seems to do a good job, and I will be watching, but not kicking...

Michael B.

P.S. sharpe ratio** 1.06
 
My M.O. is trying to understand where all these figures are coming from. My CTA does not compete directly with Quadriga. Quadriga is an offshore hedge fund with a very low minimum. I am a US-based CTA offering managed accounts exclusively to Qualified Eligible Participants with a significantly higher minimum. There is obviously a lot of confusion here regarding the performance of the various QSF funds and I was hoping to get it straightened out.

You should keep in mind that I am not the one who posted performance information that contradicts information coming directly from the source. You are. What is your motive? Why are you substituting false accusation for facts?

jj
 
I am an Accredited investor, May I ask what your minimum is and do you meet my Average Rolling Criteria?

Michael B.


Quote from John Joseph:

My M.O. is trying to understand where all these figures are coming from. My CTA does not compete directly with Quadriga. Quadriga is an offshore hedge fund with a very low minimum. I am a US-based CTA offering managed accounts exclusively to Qualified Eligible Participants with a significantly higher minimum. There is obviously a lot of confusion here regarding the performance of the various QSF funds and I was hoping to get it straightened out.

You should keep in mind that I am not the one who posted performance information that contradicts information coming directly from the source. You are. What is your motive? Why are you substituting false accusation for facts?

jj
More...
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

one year rolling 13.89 %


Close but not 25%, and not enough for me to Jump up and Down and pull trading money out and pile it into Quadriga...But Quadriga seems to do a good job, and I will be watching, but not kicking...

Michael B.

P.S. sharpe ratio** 1.06
More...

If the one year rolling is +13.89, then last Oct-Dec must have been strong, because I posted the (losing) numbers for Jan-Sept of this year.

I think there is much confusion here.
 
Quote from Ebo:

1121.18 9/30/2003
1372.57 9/302004

I get 22.42%!

The figure I posted earlier before Mr. CTA got a bug up his ass to correct me was using last weeks "unaudited" number.

I am merely a partner of The Fund, and do not have any motivation to state anything other than the truth from audited results. I am not trying to mask the fact it is a volatile investment vehicle or the actual performance of The Fund.
More...
To be completely fair, the difference between 39% and 22% is significant by any standards and not something that should be easily dismissed, is it? If you think that my desire for reasonably accurate representations of performance means that I have a "bug up my ass", well then that's something we'll both just have to live with.

jj

Edit: Nevermind the fact that the proper way to report annual or TTM returns is with monthly compounded RORs...
 
Well to make it more confusing the "rolling" could be an Average number too? I simply prefer the simple minimum criteria to be 25%..average is not necessary for the purpose of what rolling criteria is supposed to be telling me.

But again, this is not a standard benchmark to the industry, just a thing of mine. Its sort of like getting married, make sure she is compatible (you can tell a lot from her parents, too).

Michael B.

P.S. You will need to change your handle soon, NEW to ET! (newtoet)

Quote from newtoet:

If the one year rolling is +13.89, then last Oct-Dec must have been strong, because I posted the (losing) numbers for Jan-Sept of this year.

I think there is much confusion here.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top