Quadriga Superfund - Managed Futures
- Thread starter USAtrader
- Start date
Well,
Of course I would be scaling in with the drawdowns
Has it really been that long...is January here yet?
Michael B.
P.S. It the post like the one just reported by indextrader, that means that quadriga might need to "change their tires" for me to kick...I am a small player I admit it, but if I were big you would never know it! But Ebo, perhaps I have been to levels you have never imagined...(There is your set up, come on let me have it )
Of course I would be scaling in with the drawdowns
Has it really been that long...is January here yet?
Michael B.
P.S. It the post like the one just reported by indextrader, that means that quadriga might need to "change their tires" for me to kick...I am a small player I admit it, but if I were big you would never know it! But Ebo, perhaps I have been to levels you have never imagined...(There is your set up
, come on let me have it )Oct-03 -3.75%
Nov-03 -13.59%
Dec-03 15.71%
Jan-04 1.48%
Feb-04 12.74%
Mar-04 -1.91%
Apr-04 -23.57%
May-04 3.90%
Jun-04 -12.23%
Jul-04 1.74%
Aug-04 -6.35%
Sep-04 7.98%
Oct-04 6.45%
Total -17.56%
This was the original question:
I don't see where there is any comparison being requested or performed. It's nothing more than a simple question (specifically about QSF B) with a simple answer (-17.56%). Apparently, there are at least 3 simple answers to this simple question, but that's another issue entirely!
jj
Quote from John Joseph:
This was the original question:I don't see where there is any comparison being requested or performed. It's nothing more than a simple question (specifically about QSF B) with a simple answer (-17.56%). Apparently, there are at least 3 simple answers to this simple question, but that's another issue entirely!
jj
Year to date (Jan-present), A is down ~5.6 and B is down ~7.3.
I just thought that a rolling 12 mo evaluation had to always show a positive number. I was thinking this is a good criteria to benchmark with, but what do I know? I am conservative and prefer to make less but satisfying this criteria. Perhpas Quadriga is not correct for me.
Again my silly rules for letting other people trade my money may not be valid, as these are my rules, and nobody taught them to me, but myself. So again what do I know? My mentality seems to be able to live with this criteria longer than traditional judgments (small little addendum: that positive number must be at least 25% for speculative income on that rolling basis).
Michael B.
Again my silly rules for letting other people trade my money may not be valid, as these are my rules, and nobody taught them to me, but myself. So again what do I know? My mentality seems to be able to live with this criteria longer than traditional judgments (small little addendum: that positive number must be at least 25% for speculative income on that rolling basis).
Michael B.
I'm not sure where you're getting that figure...
jj
That number was based on The NAV at the the end of September 2003 through last Thursday. I do not need to defend the Funds performance, I am merely reporting the numbers I have on my E mail from them.
There indeed seems to be some confusion about the difference in performance between The GCT, QSF-B, and QSF Offshore B fund.
ebo
There indeed seems to be some confusion about the difference in performance between The GCT, QSF-B, and QSF Offshore B fund.
ebo