You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
pwned.
- Thread starter atticus
- Start date
Quote from atticus:
How would you know?
Are you asking why the video is not of doubtful origin?
Well to me it seemed like it came from him, including all the content in it. The videos, audio, photos, all was his. Nothing doubtful about the content. Everything fits his description, his voice, his success that he posted online about, ect. Additionally it was made by an obviously very clever person that has posted very outside of the box clever ideas on the internet for 10 years. And those ideas have helped me immensely. So if there is any place that video could have come from, it would be from him.
Duh.
Common atticus, this is elementary reasoning.
Quote from Curiosity_FX:
Are you asking why the video is not of doubtful origin?
Well to me it seemed like it came from him, including all the content in it. The videos, audio, photos, all was his. Nothing doubtful about the content. Additionally it was made by an obviously very clever person that has posted very outside of the box clever ideas on the internet for 10 years. And those ideas have helped me immensely. So if there is any place that video could have come from, it would be from him.
Duh.
Common atticus, this is elementary reasoning.
No, I am asking (again) how you would know that the video was not in violation if you've not talked to him? My 8yo can phrase an argument better than the ST acolyte.
Quote from atticus:
No, I am asking (again) how you would know that the video was not in violation if you've not talked to him? My 8yo can phrase an argument better than the ST acolyte.
Hah! Good one. So you are turning your dumbass claim that he was forced to remove the video onto me! How the heck would I know he wasn't forced to take it down? Hmm I don't know... ther eis nothing that suggests it at all. A better question would be how the heck would you know he was forced to take it down?!
That's what you claimed, so why don't you tell me. Or lay off your claims forever. You misuse them.
There is nothing that suggests that he had to remove the video.
Quote from Curiosity_FX:
Hah! Good one. So you are turning your dumbass claim that he was forced to remove the video onto me! How the heck would I know he wasn't forced to take it down? Hmm I don't know... ther eis nothing that suggests it at all. A better question would be how the heck would you know he was forced to take it down?!
Why don't you lay off your claims forever. You misuse them.
There is nothing that suggests that he had to remove the video.
You stated the provenance was not in question. Your claim. How can you know this w/o communicating with Hosea?
Quote from atticus:
You stated the provenance was not in question. Your claim. How can you know this w/o communicating with Hosea?
Are you fucking retarded? He stated that was his video. And there is nothing that says he is lying. The only thing we have here is a whinig retard of a person, you. That just claimed he was forced to remove the video.
Your claim.
Quote from Curiosity_FX:
Are you fucking retarded? He stated that was his video. And there is nothing that says he is lying. The only thing we have here is a whinig retard of a person, you. That just claimed he was forced to remove the video.
Your claim.
Where did he state that? And we're to go on his word alone? Like when he stated he was broke in 2006 in the Veyron thread yet stated in another thread he'd just turned $800 in $78,000,000.
The offer still stands. Reconcile the "in debt" statement with the "$78 million" and I'll apologize to the psychotic.
Here are both links for you:
Quote from atticus:
Veyon 16.4 stated he was in debt (in 2006) and forced to move 7 times due to poverty yet stated on T2W that he made $78MM in the same year:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2540595&highlight=debt#post2540595
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/forex-discussion/18626-advanced-structured-forex-trading-45.html
Completely rational. That's one keen mind. Hanger. Not my failed arguments. His.
Quote from atticus:
Where did he state that? And we're to go on his word alone? Like when he stated he was broke in 2006 in the Veyron thread yet stated in another thread he'd just turned $800 in $52,000,000.
The offer still stands. Reconcile the "in debt" statement with the "$52 million" and I'll apologize to the psychotic.
Wow really? He posted the video in response to you and others, in an effort to get you to stop lying about him.
The video is about him for going on vacation and all that, posted on his channel, ect.
And you claimed to know about the location he went to, and that it did not in fact exist. So he returned on here and proved you wrong.
And you are asking where did he state that it was his video? wtf... You're so fucking out of it now atticus it's not even funny.
And stop using that fucking post. The only thing that post could tell about him if you read it like you are doing, is that he did good and bad in 2006, or that he lied in 2006.
But then you also have to take in that in 2009 he got rich. You fucking dumb ass. But he had already been posting a lot of really good advice in 2006 and really good trades and EXCELLENT long range outlooks.
And to rearrange your words. In 2009, he posted that he had been in debt before but was now successful. He didn't post in the year 2006 that he was broke.
That whole post is about his success. And now he has a video with it. Your reasoning sucks so fucking much. And now your claiming he posted a video that he never associated with himself?
That whole post is about his success. And now he has a video with it. Your reasoning sucks so fucking much. And now your claiming he posted a video that he never associated with himself?
Quote from Curiosity_FX:
And stop using that fucking post. The only thing that post could tell about him if you read it like you are doing, is that he did good and bad in 2006, or that he lied in 2006.
But then you also have to take in that in 2009 he got rich. You fucking dumb ass. But he had already been posting a lot of really good advice in 2006 and really good trades and EXCELLENT long range outlooks.
Nuh uh. He stated in the veyron post that he was broke from 2003 + 72 months. Which irrevocably conflicts with the 78 million in 2006. He had to move seven times and considered suicide twice, his words. All within the time that he stated he turned $800 into $78 million.
There is no other explanation other than bullshit.