Hi.
I'm new to ET, but have read all I can find on the subject of Price/Volume relationship in the long threads here... I KNOW that a) this might not be the right ET department to be asking a Forex question and b) that I'm not operating at the levels of a dbphoenix (for whose wisdom and time I give hearty thanks), but nevertheless, maybe a bit of cross-pollination might prove useful?
I have at least determined that the relationship of supply/demand; price/volume/spread; S/R et al is the area of study and focus that will make me the best trader I can be.
I see clearly (albeit in a theoretical state as yet) how these relationships can be studied in the stocks/commodities markets as the volume data is descriptive and relevant.
BUT. Forex volume data is, I understand, a different beast.
I just subscribed to the excellent Multicharts platform (Forex Pro version) only to find that they no longer even provide volume data on the charts in any form â valid data or otherwise! Natiurally I'm asking them the same questions...
I have accounts with CSMFX and various MT4 brokerages which DO provide on-the-chart Volume data as a histogram, but offer no real help in determining the source or 'nature' of that data â so I don't know if I should apply what I'm starting to learn, to it. Or are they just smoke 'n' mirrors gimmicks â eye candy for the herd?
Forex is a very liquid market. It has activity. Why (please) is it's Volume data so different to non-forex volume data, if indeed it is at all?
Can I 'trust' the volume data that, say, MetaTrader offers?
Do the principles and relationship between price and volume apply in the same way in Forex as they do elsewhere?
I know a lot of the blackbox systems (like, for instance, TradeGuider) say that their Volume Spread Analysis approaches are equally applicable to Forex as Futures, but if that's true, why would a venerable, respected charting outfit like MultiCharts drop Volume Data from its studies arsenal altogether?
Any help in this area is greatly appreciated. Even if it's just a one-line pointer to a previous thread that I've not yet been able to find...
Many, many thanks
I'm new to ET, but have read all I can find on the subject of Price/Volume relationship in the long threads here... I KNOW that a) this might not be the right ET department to be asking a Forex question and b) that I'm not operating at the levels of a dbphoenix (for whose wisdom and time I give hearty thanks), but nevertheless, maybe a bit of cross-pollination might prove useful?
I have at least determined that the relationship of supply/demand; price/volume/spread; S/R et al is the area of study and focus that will make me the best trader I can be.
I see clearly (albeit in a theoretical state as yet) how these relationships can be studied in the stocks/commodities markets as the volume data is descriptive and relevant.
BUT. Forex volume data is, I understand, a different beast.
I just subscribed to the excellent Multicharts platform (Forex Pro version) only to find that they no longer even provide volume data on the charts in any form â valid data or otherwise! Natiurally I'm asking them the same questions...
I have accounts with CSMFX and various MT4 brokerages which DO provide on-the-chart Volume data as a histogram, but offer no real help in determining the source or 'nature' of that data â so I don't know if I should apply what I'm starting to learn, to it. Or are they just smoke 'n' mirrors gimmicks â eye candy for the herd?
Forex is a very liquid market. It has activity. Why (please) is it's Volume data so different to non-forex volume data, if indeed it is at all?
Can I 'trust' the volume data that, say, MetaTrader offers?
Do the principles and relationship between price and volume apply in the same way in Forex as they do elsewhere?
I know a lot of the blackbox systems (like, for instance, TradeGuider) say that their Volume Spread Analysis approaches are equally applicable to Forex as Futures, but if that's true, why would a venerable, respected charting outfit like MultiCharts drop Volume Data from its studies arsenal altogether?
Any help in this area is greatly appreciated. Even if it's just a one-line pointer to a previous thread that I've not yet been able to find...
Many, many thanks
