No. You are misinterpreting my post. I was stating a harsh reality. Foreign government may publicly object to the actions of Mossad but in private they are happy with the actions of Mossad. e.g. tracking down terrorists within their own borders and certainly in other countries other than their own.No state in the world can accept that another state may send its agents within its borders to carry out assassinations.
As you rightly object strongly to the actions you describe that Israel has carried out, I assume you're 100% with me on Russia's actions in the UK?
But do you think the Mossad should have a free hand to carry out assassinations on the territory of other sovereign states? Do you think this is right in principle?No. You are misinterpreting my post. I was stating a harsh reality. Foreign government may publicly object to the actions of Mossad but in private they are happy with the actions of Mossad. e.g. tracking down terrorists within their own borders and certainly in other countries other than their own.
Borders are not inviolable.But do you think the Mossad should have a free hand to carry out assassinations on the territory of other sovereign states? Do you think this is right in principle?
Intelligence agencies should do what is necessary to protect their countries.But do you think a foreign state should be free to send its agents into your town to assassinate someone?
So you approve of the Mossad's actions. That's bold.Intelligence agencies should do what is necessary to protect their countries.