Put Call not in parity

Why are SPY options not in parity? At a month out, Calls are about 50c more than puts at same strike.
note: does not cross dividend payout.
 
When I look at the implied vol of the puts and calls on the same strikes, I do not see any material difference.

upload_2020-1-16_17-22-34.png
 
Yes, or there is an arb. Put-call parity assumes you will hedge. There are cases where your costs do not match what market makers use so there is a benefit to you to use the options if you are not hedging. E.g. In a very hard to borrow stock, calls appear lower than puts, because the hedge for buying calls and selling puts is shorting a HTB stock. In fact, the implied interest rate is a negative rate. If you use the negative rate, and hedge, there is put-call parity. There are times when I want to get long that I prefer the long call vs long stock or selling an ITM put instead of long stock as I'm not hedging and the put is higher. If I hedge, the cost built-in makes sense and there is put-call parity and no arb.
So, should there always be rough put/call parity?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FSU
Yes, or there is an arb. Put-call parity assumes you will hedge.

No it doesn't ... we have discussed before ... Put-Call Parity only holds for European Exercise Style Options ... and not American Exercise Style Options with Dividends such as SPY ...

From John Hull ( Options, Futures and Other Derivatives )

pcp_Parity ( Hull ).png
 
Back
Top