Pure Tick - Last Day for Trading Alerts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alex, even if the trades in Performance are simulated, you could still have C2 track them directly from your broker. Half a loaf is better than none in this case and it would go a long way to bringing in new subscribers.

It's no sweat off your back. You have everything to gain and nothing to lose and you would silence your detractors (I'm neutral by the way).
 
For the record:

I've never paid a single cent to this thief, my brother on the other hand did, and that is how I found out this guy is a buffoon who acts like he's got something to offer.

Yes, I did see Alex average down in public like a fool and execute plenty other rookie mistakes in his room. For a head trader, you can imagine how laughable this is.

Yes, it took me a while to see through the smoke of Puretick, lot of fishy actions.

Yes, I'm 100% convinced he cannot trade consistently profitable and his track record is a farse.

Now, enough of this, let's take it to the next level.

Alex:

I challenge you to a trading duel.

One condition though, both results audited and publicly released right here on the forums and ET readers get to setup the rules.

If you win, I will make a public apology and cease posting.

If I win, Puretick/Spectra/Banker and all the countless made up usernames get the heck out of the forums.

Looking forward to your reply.

Susana
 
Quote from SusanaDT:

Alex:

I challenge you to a trading duel.

One condition though, both results audited and publicly released right here on the forums and ET readers get to setup the rules.

If you win, I will make a public apology and cease posting.

If I win, Puretick/Spectra/Banker and all the countless made up usernames get the heck out of the forums.

Looking forward to your reply.

Susana
More...

Alex has no testicles if he does not accept this challenge!
 
This is like that movie The Quick and the Dead.

Susana (Sharon Stone) has just straight up challenged the head guy (Gene Hackman) of a trading site to a duel.

Interesting to see what excuse Spectra gives for declining the challenge.
 
Quote from lilduckling:

This is like that movie The Quick and the Dead.

Susana (Sharon Stone) has just straight up challenged the head guy (Gene Hackman) of a trading site to a duel.

Interesting to see what excuse Spectra gives for declining the challenge.
More...


If I remember correctly, Sharon Stone won the
duel.
 
Quote from SusanaDT:

For the record:

I've never paid a single cent to this thief, my brother on the other hand did, and that is how I found out this guy is a buffoon who acts like he's got something to offer.

Yes, I did see Alex average down in public like a fool and execute plenty other rookie mistakes in his room. For a head trader, you can imagine how laughable this is.

Yes, it took me a while to see through the smoke of Puretick, lot of fishy actions.

Yes, I'm 100% convinced he cannot trade consistently profitable and his track record is a farse.

Now, enough of this, let's take it to the next level.

Alex:

I challenge you to a trading duel.

One condition though, both results audited and publicly released right here on the forums and ET readers get to setup the rules.

If you win, I will make a public apology and cease posting.

If I win, Puretick/Spectra/Banker and all the countless made up usernames get the heck out of the forums.

Looking forward to your reply.

Susana
More...
Go on girl!

Okay gang, I'm booking action on this. On the opening line, SusanaDT is a slight favorite to win at 3:2. The odds on Alex are 2:1. The only prop bet we have is whether Alex takes the challenge--the line is 2:5 he doesn't.
 
Oh btw, Mr. Alex the Scammer if you are going to pose as a pro you might want to get some info correctly in your main page before making any claims, it really makes you look like a complete newbie but then again no real surprise there.

In this video:

http://puretick.com/video/bestindex/

You stated several false assessments.

1) NQ is more liquid than YM, it's not the inverse like you incorrectly stated, in fact is much more liquid than YM.

2) NQ is 20.00 per point, not 25, like you incorrectly stated again.

Considering your example in the video, the losing call would have lost less money in the NQ, $155.00 and not the YM.

Toodles,
Susana
 
Quote from SusanaDT:

Oh btw, Mr. Alex the Scammer if you are going to pose as a pro you might want to get some info correctly in your main page before making any claims, it really makes you look like a complete newbie but then again no real surprise there.

In this video:

http://puretick.com/video/bestindex/

You stated several false assessments.

1) NQ is more liquid than YM, it's not the inverse like you incorrectly stated, in fact is much more liquid than YM.

2) NQ is 20.00 per point, not 25, like you incorrectly stated again.

Considering your example in the video, the losing call would have lost less money in the NQ, $155.00 and not the YM.

Toodles,
Susana
More...

Sheesh, what's happening to Alex? He used to be such a professional loser and now hes's even more of a... loser. Oh well.
 
Quote from SusanaDT:

Oh btw, Mr. Alex the Scammer if you are going to pose as a pro you might want to get some info correctly in your main page before making any claims, it really makes you look like a complete newbie but then again no real surprise there.

In this video:

http://puretick.com/video/bestindex/

You stated several false assessments.

1) NQ is more liquid than YM, it's not the inverse like you incorrectly stated, in fact is much more liquid than YM.

2) NQ is 20.00 per point, not 25, like you incorrectly stated again.

Considering your example in the video, the losing call would have lost less money in the NQ, $155.00 and not the YM.

Toodles,
Susana
More...
All I can say is ... LOL, this pretty much tells everyone what they need to know about Alex and Puretick. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top