Quote from baggerlord:
The DSM is the standard used by mental health professionals. I don't know your background but I doubt you know better, and I am 100% confident the elite posters on this forum don't.
And just my personal opinion but I don't see anything wrong with homosexuality and sadomasochism being included as disorders. Getting it on with other guys doesn't exactly serve any purpose as far as keeping the species alive, and putting you know what up the you know where isn't too healthy or natural. I do understand it is considered to be genetic these days and I don't dispute that. Plenty of mental and physical disorders are genetic. Some people are attracted to little boys. Should we make that OK too because it is genetic? How about animals?
And sadomasochism quite frankly is a no brainer as far as I am concerned. Getting off on hurting others is ****ed up.
No background in psychology is required to identify basic logical inconsistencies in people's thinking or actions. The fact is that DSM had classed these 2 behaviours as mental illnesses, then one day it didn't any more. Nothing changed in the nature of the behaviours - the facts stayed exactly the same. All that changed was the opinion of mental health professionals and wider society as to what was culturally unacceptable. Therefore, the methodology of DSM is reliant on mere opinion, rather than actual facts and evidence. That makes it unscientific and unreliable.
A legitimate scientific methodology, as we find across the hard sciences, would only make claims that are support by facts and evidence - not ones whose only supporting evidence. When the facts contradict social convention and cultural norms, legitimate science *always* favours the former. DSM didn't, which is a strong sign that it is pseudo-science.
Morality and mental illness don't necessarily intersect. For example, beating up someone who called you an idiot isn't a mental disorder, but it is definitely immoral. Thinking you are Napoleon isn't immoral at all, but it is definitely a mental disorder. Thus, moral judgements alone can't decide whether someone is insane or mentally ill. Besides, morals are subjective and not even agreed upon by individuals, and social norms of morality change radically over time (e.g. slavery; homosexuality; blasphemy; racism).
As for something not propagating the species - well, having anal sex with your wife or girlfriend doesn't reproduce either, neither does having sex whilst using contraception. Both the pill and straight anal sex have higher health risks. Presumably you don't think heterosexual sodomy or contraceptive use fall into the category of mental disorders? Besides, homosexuality does not necessarily involve anal sex - it'd be rather difficult for lesbians, don't you think?
Being unnatural is also irrelevant both to morality and mental illness. Driving a car is unnatural, sitting at a desk all day is unnatural, making plastics or semiconductors is unnatural. No sensible person thinks this is a sign of mental illness or immorality.
Finally, even on pure morals, your arguments don't stack up. You are trying to compare consensual behaviours between adults, to non-consensual activities that victimise those who either don't (kids) or can't (animals) give consent - that's a flawed comparison. I am sure that some boxers and MMA fighters enjoy hurting others, so do many of those who watch these sports with interest - is that fucked up too, does that make sport fighting a mental disorder? No it doesn't, because the fighters willingly consent to getting hit and harmed. A non-consensual street beatdown would be fucked up, a brutal boxing match would not be. Just like non-consensual sadism or non-consensual sodomy would be fucked up, but an agreed night of bondage between two adults, or two lesbians having sex, would not be. Plus, there are masochists who don't hurt anybody, so they don't even fall under your classification.
All this is rather ironic, considering that you are joining an organisation that has butchered millions of innocent civilians throughout its history. Two women kissing, or a husband tying up and spanking his wife because she asks him to, are immoral and mental disorders according to you, but napalming babies and bayoneting old women, or carpet-bombing civilian areas in neutral countries, is not only acceptable but you actually make it your living to support an organisation guilty of these atrocities. Have you thought that maybe you are the one with the mental disorder and morally questionable conduct here?