Did you mean to say..."Virtually every wildly successful INVESTOR places risk mgmt as the most important aspect in INVESTING"?As a short term TRADER I would die without my edge!
![]()
PTJ - Traded cotton futures all day and than traded gold in the the night time session in his earlier years, he now runs a hedge fund. He is a traders trader that has made billions. It's not how many trades you make that matters, the idea is to make your equity curve point north & stay that way.
Big firms trading for decades, with endless capital, PHD programmers from the top universities, scores of seasoned traders, expensive ultra low latency networks, and dozens to hundreds of systems running decade after decade still place their top priority on RM. Entry signals are cyclical, at some point they all have piss poor performance. The markets are always changing - true edges are fleeting.
Novice traders become obsessed with entry signals, been there done that . Only the Citadels of the world truly have a static edge - it cost them a few hundred million for the infrastructure and relationships. In decades of reading and listening to interviews with the best traders every single one of them spoke in length on risk/trade mgmt & psychology , not a one ever claimed they had an edge from their entry signals.
Entry signals are a big rabbit hole. Once you have that ahaa risk mgmt moment you will never look back. It is only natural for newer traders in their first 1-10 years or so tend to get stuck on entry signals. The best traders all have one thing in common, they all consider their RM is what separates them from the many losers.
Last edited:
As a short term TRADER I would die without my edge!
