There are many ways to pick entries and exits. All are known. There is no edge in picking entries and exits. The edge is in how trades are managed.
INCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!INCORRECT!!!!!!!!INCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!INCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!INCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!! How can you say "all are known"? Your IQ level keeps dropping with every absolute you say!There are many ways to pick entries and exits. All are known. There is no edge in picking entries and exits. The edge is in how trades are managed.
Yes...he held through crashes, but if he didn't hold through the crashes (by selling at the top) he would need a good ENTRY method to get back in at the bottom of the crash...ie edge in entry. So, to maximize returns the entry would still be very important in this example. Thank you for your time!In your posting describing your father, you have basically made the point that PRM is the only edge in trading. The man traded a 100 percent winning strategy and made money, however did not maximimize these gains because he did not observe PRM. ---ie he held through crashes etc. ---
This thread is completely silly. Money management doesn't save a losing strategy, it will just bleed to death SLOWER.
I already explained this on page 5 or so...
It's unlikely as the 95 percent that you describe would have money management skills that were deficient. --The amount of money lost and/or speed would decrease it would seem, but not the ratio of winners.I have a question, which Buy1Sell2 ignored earlier in another thread, if all 95% of losing traders were to always stick to their money management plan and at the same time reduce greatly leverage being used would the overall ratio of winning vs losing traders increase or decrease?