In isolation, you could arguably give Lucrum a pass. But against the background of his posting history, the underlying string is unmistakable. You will note that this is the point I made in my earlier post.Quote from Ricter:
I'm as liberal as they get but I didn't see racism in the tiger/jungle comment.
+10Quote from Gabfly1:
In isolation, you could arguably give Lucrum a pass. But against the background of his posting history, the underlying string is unmistakable. You will note that this is the point I made in my earlier post.
Dog-whistle racism is intended to be plausibly deniable. That's why a single point of reference seldom tells the tale. But if you follow the crumbs (or Lucrums, as the case may be), the pattern and underlying message become obvious. Racists can be fairly clever cockroaches. Even so, they're a lower form of life, which is why an attentive human being can almost always spot them in the fullness of time. Go ahead and try it. It's fun.
Here's a reality check: You're a flaming racist.Quote from FeenixRizin:
Here's a reality check ...
Woods surpassed a billion dollars in earnings ... largely based on his image. An image he created, which has proven to be false.
I used to watch golf religiously, I haven't much since Woods became its figure head.
Another thing, just my theory, Woods is a doper. He is so obviously on the roids, it's comical that literally no one has raised the possibility.
Woods capitalized on decades of development of the gentlmen's game by gentlemen, and he has sullied it. You can bet Jack saw this coming, he always had his doubts about Woods.
Woods greater golfer then Bobby Jones? Good god, woods couldn't carry Jone's bag.
Unchangeable animal? But didn't we all including woods evolve from apes? Which live in jungles last I checked.Quote from kut2k2:
First there's the analogy between the behavior of a particular human being with the behavior of a wild unchangeable animal...