Quote from Brass:
Could be because I went to the gym after my market's RTH.
As for debating you, thanks but no thanks. I've seen your "debate" style. You reframe every valid argument to suit your underlying narrative. I don't find that to be particularly honest. I'm not even convinced you could identify Keynesian economics in a lineup, so we wouldn't even have a legitimate starting point. As you may or may not know, I have already said all I have to say about my economic views, and I have no interest in either repeating myself, adding to it or wrestling with an eel. I've done it before with other posters and found that it's just not worth my time. But thanks for asking. Just recognize that your views are considered to be on the fringe by the majority of those who have devoted their professional lives to the subject matter.
Ok, I kinda figured you'd cop out. But denner is correct. There are a lot of well known economists who do not subscribe to your so-called "majority". In fact, there are more each day as they realize what a failure the current system is.
At least you bow out definitively, and don't melt away like Ricter when he loses the argument. Of course, the excuse about "seeing how I debate" supposedly scaring you off when you get into dozens of far more viscous flame wars a day here is a rather flimsy one. Do I scare you all that much?