Quote from Brass:
You see? This is the kind of stuff I don't want getting stuck on the bottom of my shoes. Jem, I commend you for your ability to pervert economic thought as well as all manner of scientific inquiry. You do your side proud.
No one is denying that there can be too much taxation. Let's move on.Quote from jem:
When faced with the reality that Keynes was a supply sider brass would rather bullshit...
Keynes --
Nor should the argument seem strange that taxation may be so high as to defeat its object, and that, given sufficient time to gather the fruits, a reduction of taxation will run a better chance than an increase of balancing the budget. For to take the opposite view today is to resemble a manufacturer who, running at a loss, decides to raise his price, and when his declining sales increase the loss, wrapping himself in the rectitude of plain arithmetic, decides that prudence requires him to raise the price still more--and who, when at last his account is balanced with nought on both sides, is still found righteously declaring that it would have been the act of a gambler to reduce the price when you were already making a loss
See? It's just not worth it. You've already said this to him before, and more than once, I believe. Even so, he thinks he's being fresh and clever. Jem is like a surgeon with mittens. Being a black-and-white, all-or-nothing kind of guy relieves him of having to think or exercise judgment. You've seen him obliterate all manner of context, let alone nuance, in any of the science threads he participated in. As I said, he specializes in shoe pudding.Quote from Ricter:
No one is denying that there can be too much taxation. Let's move on.
Quote from Brass:
See? It's just not worth it. You've already said this to him before, and more than once, I believe. Even so, he thinks he's being fresh and clever. Jem is like a surgeon with mittens. Being a black-and-white, all-or-nothing kind of guy relieves him of having to think or exercise judgment. You've seen him obliterate all manner of context, let alone nuance, in any of the science threads he participated in. As I said, he specializes in shoe pudding.
Depends on what taxes we're talking about. Lowering corporate taxes is useless, they themselves report that it is a lack of sales holding back hiring, and they are also reporting record profits and cash holdings.Quote from jem:
Now we are heading in the right direction.
There are times when lower taxes can improve the economy....
Brass you remember lying your ass off about tax cuts preceding higher revenues....
All of a sudden you wish to truthful? Cool.
Guess what - now might be another one of those times.
Cap spending lower taxes - grow into balance.
Just like Keynes said.
Higher Taxes is the exact opposite of what needs to be done.
Frankly I would prefer to restructure the tax code... but at least we can all agree on lowering axes and capping spending. for the good of the country-- right?
===========Quote from Tsing Tao:
The comments under the article are hilarious. My fav: "
"We can't debase our way to prosperity. I wish that we would stop trying. "
(LOL!)
