Quote from Sky123987:
YOU ARE 100% WRONG ON THIS.
http://www.powerhomebiz.com/vol136/structure.htm
In an S corporation, only the salary paid to the employee-owner is subject to employment tax. The remaining income that is paid as a distribution is not subject to employment tax under IRS rules. Therefore, there is the potential to realize substantial employment tax savings.
FIRST: In an S-corporation, the employee-owner is subject to DOUBLE FICA tax. 14-15% rather than nothing when just putting as unemployed and putting your gains as your cap gains. This dboule FICA, in addition to the fed/state/other taxes alone wipes out most of the clever benefit to all the extra work and expense involved.
$80K?? Unemployed - ZERO FICA. S Corp owner, tries to get salary of $40K, pays the double FICA and winds up like paying on a normal salaried job of $80K. Why is it hard to get through to you????????
SECOND, the FICA tax cuts off for everyone at about $94K, so if you do well, it is quibbling over this amount.
THIRD, if you think you will be clever, and put something like $10K annual salary and $50-90K as distributive, this will not pass muster. The IRS is not stupid. The salary must be reasonable. Many clever people get lanced when they try to lowball this. As I said, I owned an S corp. Most of the stuff that people pass around is theoretical fluff. S Corp owners draw much more scrutiny.
FOURTH, spouses are considered as a single person, so there is not a marriage out using the wife as another owner.
FIFTH, a lot of the extra benefits people think they will realize are wiped out be the standard deduction. It takes a lot of looking around for deductions just to reach that amount.