Quote from DEM BONES:
Thanks for the thread.
When trading C and the like have you had any success trading the spread with size or do you generally scale into a position at different levels?
Good question, it's interesting because I was just discussing this issue in particular with TokyoGhetto.
Yeah I have tried spreading with size. I also know someone who has spread it with 1m shares... yes 1 million shares!! This person made a ton of $$ in 2009 and early 2010. Not now though and hasn't done for a while.
The problem is that some days it comes back... other days it just stay up/down there and never comes back to your entry. Today was a good day to scalp .86s -.88s a couple of times.
However this trading just doesn't work for me... I always find the fees generated in executing this trade mean that if I get it wrong once then it cancels out 2-3 of my good trades.
Honestly you never know when the specialist is going to bang 2million+ shares on the next level right after it has gone through one level. So I find the % is just not there for me to be profitable like that.
I prefer to take a bit smaller size.... like 20k and add as it goes with me to something like 50k position. Sometimes I won't add to ensure I don't get shaken out.
example... this morning on C I bought 20k @ $4.80 it went through .81 and then cleared almost all of .82.... I'm thinking great! awesome!! good trade... then... bang!!! As everyone is buying .82s someone (specialist / some institution) slams the .81 and the .80's in a matter of seconds... then slams the .79's a couple seconds later. How the hell can you predict that? I got out as this is normally VERY BAD price action in Citi. But it recovered and I had banged out at the worst place and my trade would have netted $2k by the end of the day. Thats why I prefer scaling in as I only took a small loss and prob would have been killed trying to spread any of that