Proposed NFA Capital Requirement

Quote from Ivanovich:

I could care less if he is or isn't. He's simply stating information that is good to know. So far I've not seen one comment from him telling me I should go with one company or another. Only attacks from posters with 40, 11 and 48 previous posts - indicating that they represent the interest of those companies not meeting the requirement, and are not exactly true ET posters.


Well I have been on ET for a month now, and that is why I have only 40 posts, and that doesnt mean that I work for a broker. I have been reading his posts, and I think that they are one sided.
 
Oh ok, I forgot he just made up all that stuff about the NFA increasing capital requirements and some shady firms locking up client funds.

My mistake.
 
Quote from Bongo972:

Oh ok, I forgot he just made up all that stuff about the NFA increasing capital requirements and some shady firms locking up client funds.

My mistake.


You are right, but dont you think that he is leaving things out?
 
Quote from Paliz:

You are right, but dont you think that he is leaving things out?

If he is, why don't you supplement the data with your own findings? Seems to me he's the one supplying all the data and you guys are the ones supplying all the insults.
 
Quote from Paliz:

You are right, but dont you think that he is leaving things out?

Maybe he failed to mention a small firm that is going out of business or something. Like an honest mistake.

I don't know why someone would trade with a small, let alone unregulated firm when you can get better execution with larger firms and security.

I mean these small guys that give insane tight spreads, who says they have to execute you at that price? A lot of them shade prices and flat slip your ass.

And if there's a dispute, you're fucked.

Can someone tell me something that a small firm gives that a large regulated competitor doesn't?

Please, I'm listening with no ulterior motives.
 
Quote from Bongo972:

Maybe he failed to mention a small firm that is going out of business or something. Like an honest mistake.

I don't know why someone would trade with a small, let alone unregulated firm when you can get better execution with larger firms and security.

I mean these small guys that give insane tight spreads, who says they have to execute you at that price? A lot of them shade prices and flat slip your ass.

And if there's a dispute, you're fucked.

Can someone tell me something that a small firm gives that a large regulated competitor doesn't?

Please, I'm listening with no ulterior motives.


He failed to mention a lot, he says that he does this to protect traders, then he says that he only wants to discuss the minimum requirement, and then goes to discuss FRAUD invloving only a smaller firm.......he should be on this thread replying to other ET posters and not waiting until a small firm is in trouble. No one else should speak for him, but himself!!!!
 
It's a bit odd that ForexSavior is doing this. In fact, he even quoted one of my articles, that's how I found this forum.

He does, however, raise some good points.

There's lots of regulation coming down on retail forex dealers lately from the NFA. You should understand the rules, and make sure you choose a broker that isn't at risk.

And it's not just revenue requirements anymore. They've also gone after the Introducing Brokers (IBs) (http://www.pfxglobal.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=937&Itemid=188)

On the new revenue requirements:
http://www.pfxglobal.com/index.php?...=459&Itemid=188


John
 
Quote from JohnPFX:

It's a bit odd that ForexSavior is doing this. In fact, he even quoted one of my articles, that's how I found this forum.

He does, however, raise some good points.

There's lots of regulation coming down on retail forex dealers lately from the NFA. You should understand the rules, and make sure you choose a broker that isn't at risk.

And it's not just revenue requirements anymore. They've also gone after the Introducing Brokers (IBs) (http://www.pfxglobal.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=937&Itemid=188)

On the new revenue requirements:
http://www.pfxglobal.com/index.php?...=459&Itemid=188


John



Guy, one of your articles can't be accessed
 
Back
Top