Proposed NFA Capital Requirement

IBFX's Annus Horribilis

It has not been a good year for Interbank FX. First FXLQ goes down resulting in the firm losing a key liquidity provider. Then FXLQ goes into receivership taking $10 million of IBFX's net capital with it. Now IBFX has just announced to the public that there was a major security breach and that customers who had applied for an account prior to April 2, 2007, had their personal information exposed on a rogue server accessible to anyone on the internet.
http://doj.nh.gov/consumer/pdf/interbank.pdf

To IBFX's credit they appear to have taken immediate steps to secure the information and are offering those customers who were potentially exposed free membership to a credit monitoring company. I'm not familiar with Corporate Law but it appears IBFX hired Kirkland & Ellis to contact State Attorneys General about this? Pretty Intensive damage control by the folks at Interbank.

But considering the news has broken all over the net well outside the forex community best to cover all bases I guess:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:*&q=interbankfx+security+breach

Let's hope Robert Gray hasn't been lurking around this rogue server all this time...
 
Swiss Dealer Update

Fransesc Riverola is doing a top notch job at FX Street keeping traders up to date about the latest regulatory changes in Switzerland. He has sent out questionnaires to the Swim FX Broker community and several have responded, most recently Crown Forex who has stated they are applying for a banking license.
http://weblog.fxstreet.com/2008/04/open-letter-t-1.html

Crown Forex’s CEO was quoted as saying:

investors must be very careful when dealing with Swiss brokers that do not see the high importance of applying for a bank license. It is important to keep in mind that many small brokers will not be able to apply or even comply with the new regulations due to the huge financial requirements this type of license incurs.
More...

BINGO. He is dead on. This is why I started the Swiss Dealer Dead Pool. The gig is up for the schlock shops in Switzerland. Either get a banking license or in the words of Der Terminator “GET OUT!” Firms will need to have a minimum $9 million in firm capital and meet a whole variety of accounting requirements in order to get a banking license.

The CEO of Crown Forex closed his remarks by saying:

As a result in the regulatory ordinances in Switzerland, very few Swiss brokers will remain in the game, if I may say so, by the end of 2009. Probably only 5 or 6 brokers will survive out of all the brokers, whether medium or small.
More...

Here an updated Dead Pool for the trading public.

Firms that claim they are applying for a banking license
1) ACM
2) Fibo Group
3) Crown Forex
4) DukasCopy
5) MIGfx
6) GFX Group (forex.ch)

Firms that are fleeing Swiss Regulation
1) Masterforex. Their business office is listed in Switzerland but they are registered in the Seychelles and have stated they do not need to get a banking license.
2) forex-swiss. FXCH, despite the fact they are NAMED "Forex Swiss" claim registration in Dominica. This is an odd company that has claimed multiple office addresses over the years including, Switzerland, Austria, South Africa, Iran, and the United States. Today they are claiming they have offices in Dominica and the United Kingdom. Tomorrow who knows, they could claim a mailing address in Tibet. Beware this firm.
3) Prime4X. Their head office is in Switzerland but they have stated they are applying for a license in Cyprus.

Firms that are no longer accepting customers or have been shutdown
1) WestCapFX
2) Tradex Swiss AG
3) Finex
4) Aleccohfx

Firms that refuse to comment
1) Swiss Direkt
2) Tadawulfx
3) Advised Trading

As always conduct your due diligence and make sure the firm you trade with is regulated and legit.
 
Shark Hunting in the Caribbean

With all these bogus claims from small time brokers claiming they are regulated because they hold a “certificate” they managed to pull out of a cereal box it is hard to know what to believe these days when a firm states they are “licensed.”

And perhaps no firm straddles the line between licensed and unregulated more than a firm by the name of GCI Financial. A reader asked me to provide some background on GCI recently and after doing a quick Internet search I found myself once again swimming in the deepest, darkest, murkiest depths of the Forex Ocean in search of that most dangerous dorsal finned predator of all- the offshore FX boiler-room.

GCI appears to have been started back in the 1990’s and used to be a U.S. based company with its CEO, Mitch Vasquez, living in Wilton, CT. It didn’t take too many clicks of the mouse to discover that GCI had been busted by the CFTC under the headline “CFTC CRACKS DOWN ON FOREIGN CURRENCY SCAMS NATIONWIDE.”
http://www.cftc.gov/opa/enf02/opa4611-02.htm

The complaint itself charged GCI for violating the Commodity Exchange Act. In short, the CFTC was taking GCI to court because they had not registered with the NFA (Hello FXDD! This could someday happen to you!)
http://www.cftc.gov/files/enf/02orders/enfgci-order.pdf

Also cited in this lawsuit was Vazquez. In 2002, Vazquez and GCI settled the suit and as part of the settlement Vazquez paid a $100,000 fine and agreed to

“for a period of three years, not to act in any capacity or affiliate in any way with any individual or entity which involves the solicitation, acceptance of orders, transmissions of orders, execution, advice related to, pooling of funds, or recommendation for or of futures contracts, options on futures contracts, or options on foreign currency either (i) for or on behalf of any U.S. citizen or U.S. resident, regardless of where cleared or conducted; or (ii) that are cleared or conducted in the U.S., whether on or off-exchange, regardless of the citizenship or residency of the parties.
More...

Sounds pretty clear to me. Basically, Vazquez and GCI were expected to close their doors and get out of the FX business.

But apparently GCI didn’t see it that way. Instead, they submerged beneath the water and headed to Belize. Well at least their “State of the Art” dealing room fled to Belize. But Vazquez doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere as a FEC filing showed he contributed $2000 to George Bush’s Presidential Campaign in 2004 where he listed an address in New Canaan, CT.
http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=name&lname=VAZQUEZ&fname=MITCHELL

Meanwhile in Switzerland (cue up Jaws music)…

According to the gossip on the bulletin boards Vazquez had apparently branched out into the notorious Swiss Market. Rumor has it that GCI and GFX (Forex.CH) are the same firm. This was news to me. But several people have stated that Vazquez is also a director at GFX and also points out that the websites of GCI and GFX are remarkably similar and also housed on the same servers?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?perpage=40&pagenumber=1&threadid=76386
http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=7884
http://www.forexpeacearmy.com/public/review/www.gfxsa.com?page=0&perpage=10

Also, it appears that GFX has recently gotten into some trouble with the Swiss Government according to one trader who cited this (translation welcome if anyone speaks Francais):
http://rc.geneve.ch/rc/consultation/consultationcomplete.asp?no_dossier_fed=CH-660-1425005-9

As for GCI, it claims registration in Belize and you can actually verify they are in fact licensed by the regulatory authorities there:
http://www.ifsc.gov.bz/licensed_provider.html#f

Strangely, GCI doesn’t provide this link on their website which would allow traders to verify this independently which I just did as the Savior is nothing if not fair and balanced.

The reason GCI may be quiet about their regulatory status with Belize officials is because the IFSC does not actually do much aside from collect fees and provide “guidelines” to businesses. In fact, they state on their own website:
http://www.ifsc.gov.bz/about.html

“The Commission relies on self-regulation, meaning that while government sets overall standards, it expects much of the actual work in terms of monitoring and compliance to be done by the industry itself.”
More...

Bwahahaha! As if a forex firm that has been driven out of the United States for being a “scam” is going to properly “self-regulate” itself. This tells you about all you need to know about the quality of Belize regulation.

So what should traders take from all this? Common sense would dictate that traders avoid GCI. Their compliance history is poor and their current regulators in Belize clearly don’t give a damn what they do so long as they pay their bills on time. At the end of the day GCI is just another shark in the water. Here’s hoping someone harpoons them and sends them to the bottom of the ocean from whence they can never be dredged up again.
 
eToro: All Hat, No Cattle

This is going to be a post rife with Texas sized clichés. How can it not be with a company with a name like “eToro” that has a logo with a pair of bull horns jutting out of it?

First of all who are these guys? Well they are one the newest FX brokers in the market who are taking a very novel approach to currency trading. They also have ties to the online gambling rackets as their CTO is David Ring who was a key R&D leader at Israeli-based 888.com (a major online casino and poker operator) according to this feature article that came out last fall:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/27/etoro-makes-forex-trade-childs-play

But this Israeli firm’s ties go much deeper than to just an Internet gambling website (and please spare me the term “gaming.”) They also have connections to none other than Shimon Peres, the President of Israel. It appears Shimon Peres’ son, Chimi Peres, is one of eToro’s private investors:
http://www.pitango.com/team_member.asp?ID=25

So how is eToro standing out in the marketplace aside from their exotic resume? Well they have created the first forex video game. You have to see the screen shots to believe them:
http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/etoro_match.jpg
http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/etoro_marathon.jpg

But aside from the cute cartoon characters inhabiting its software (which led one trader to state eToro should rename itself “eTarded”) the truth is eToro is just shoveling the same old Bull at traders. What makes me say that? Well, when I asked them if they were regulated they gave me the ol’ Texas Two Step. Check out this chat transcript below:

Daniel: Welcome to eToro! How can I help you?
you: I was interested in opening a new account with you and see that you are based in Cyprus. Are you registered with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission?
Daniel: of course
you: oh good. what is you Cyprus sec number?
you: i don't see you firm listed in their database
Daniel: I'm sorry. I can only give you support regarding our platform
Daniel: for more information you can address our website
Daniel: or retailfx's website
you: but your website says nothing about you sec license
you: what is retail fx's website?
Daniel: http://www.retailfx.com/
Daniel: this is our worldwide broker
you: this website says nothing about your license either
you: so do you have a license or not?
Daniel: I'm not sure what you are looking for
Daniel: i can help you regarding our platform
you: Do you have a Cyprus Securities and Exchange license?
Daniel: we do have a license
you: is it a Cyprus SEC license?
you: What kind of license do you have?
Daniel: I'm sorry... I don't know these details. I can only give support regarding our platform
you: ok do you have an email address?
you: who can I speak to about this?
Daniel: support@etoro.com
you: I just want to make sure you are a legitimate company
you: there are a lot of scammers in fx
Daniel: we are totally legit
Daniel: you can check with IFX
you: who?
Daniel: and the NFA
you: nfa?
you: you have an nfa license?
Daniel: IFX..our US broker
Daniel: we are regulated by the NFA
you: eToro has a nfa license?
Daniel: would you please send us an organized email with all of your questions?
More...

eToro is an Israeli company with a Cyprus address and a British Virgin Islands Registration. Now what kind of business arrangement is that? That is about as unaccountable as you can get. When I asked their chat representative if they have a Cyprus SEC license (which they should have if they have an office in Cyprus and are soliciting customers from Cyrpus) the rep says “of course.”

When I point out that eToro is not listed as having a license at the Cyprus SEC website I’m directed to another company that supposedly has a license, retailfx.com, I find they don’t have a license either. At which point the customer service rep breaks down and blabbers about their arrangement with IFX.

Clearly eToro talks the regulatory talk but they don’t walk the regulatory walk.

So what about this link with IFX? Well it turns out that eToro can’t accept U.S. customers. Hmmm. That’s strange. Plenty of offshore forex brokers accept U.S. customers. Why not eToro? Instead, eToro has to rely on IFX who is apparently white labeling eToro’s Sony Playstation, er, forex trading software.

It’s pretty obvious why eToro can’t accept U.S. customers. It’s because they are nothing more than a gambling shop and online casinos outside the U.S. are not allowed to accept U.S. customers. eToro’s lawyers are obviously worried that Uncle Sam will come after them with a vengeance if they start soliciting customers (not to mention the MGM Grand, Powerball, Pat Robertson, Ralph Reed and Mike Huckabee.)

What does that tell you about the kind of dealing desk these guys are running? The firm is a straight up casino- they only make money if you lose money. It is market making on anabolic horse steroids. In short, it is every currency trader’s worst nightmare come true.

By the way I sent eToro an email asking for clarification on their regulation. Of course there was no reply. Lord somebody fence these guys in…
 
New CFTC Numbers Are Out

Here are the latest adjusted net capital figuress for U.S. based forex brokers:
http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@financialdataforfcms/documents/file/fcmdata0308.pdf

Above $20 Million
Oanda $163,000,000
FXCM $87,000,000
GFT Forex $76,000,000
Gain Capital $73,000,000
Interbank FX $28,000,000
I Trade FX $27,000,000

Below $20 Million
PFG $19,000,000
FX Solutions $17,000,000
ODL $14,700,000
CMS $13,900,000
GFS Forex $11,000,000
IFX $10,600,000
Ikon $8,800,000
Alpari $8,800,000
CMC $8,300,000
Friedberg Mercantile $8,000,000
Forex Club $7,900,000
Hotspot $7,700,000
MB Trading $7,700,000
Easy Forex $7,200,000
Money Garden $6,600,000
Bacera $5,500,000
Advanced Markets $5,100,000
 
lol... look at those tiny numbers!!!!!!!!!!!


Seriously you people are crazy to have money with those companies.... think about it.. how much money does a large trader run? Hedge funds.. 2-8 billion..... cta's 1 million to 500 million? Fund of funds.. billions .. I would say that almost no one who has any real large accoutns would ever put it at risk in those dinky retail FX firms... a 100,000 dollar accouotn is pretty large for most fo those firms.. LOL..
 
Quote from ssss:

Moe27


why worry about traders trading spot fx, if you guys like trading currency futures trade and be happy, im happy with spot fx.


No worry ,but broker which make good impression
(protection of the funds) in spot fx only one hotspotfx.com
U.K.
More...

Incorrect. Clients of FSA regulated UK financial services companies accepting client funds, including spot FX marketmakers, are afforded a level of protection up to GBP35k provided the account was set up correctly in the first place.
 
Quote from jaytrader100:

lol... look at those tiny numbers!!!!!!!!!!!


Seriously you people are crazy to have money with those companies.... think about it.. how much money does a large trader run? Hedge funds.. 2-8 billion..... cta's 1 million to 500 million? Fund of funds.. billions .. I would say that almost no one who has any real large accoutns would ever put it at risk in those dinky retail FX firms... a 100,000 dollar accouotn is pretty large for most fo those firms.. LOL..
More...

We're not hedge funds or CTA's though, we're just private traders. These firms offer a reasonable deal as far as I can see, there's nothing fundamentally wrong with retail bucketshops as long as they stay solvent.
 
cabletrader


Incorrect. Clients of FSA regulated UK financial services companies accepting client funds, including spot FX marketmakers, are afforded a level of protection up to GBP35k provided the account was set up correctly in the first place
*******************************

Thank you ,but was informed two week before
about that from another ET member .

Sorry ,but personla experience of the author with FSA is not good

young female and long processing time

For companies IPO London is good place ,as LSE is not so restrictiv as SEC

But it is dialecticaly connected with investors .

SEC evaluated from author
better for retail sector as London with FSA


Your respectfully
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top