Prop Trading nasdaq stocks

Originally posted by rtharp
(He get's a block of 80,000 to sell) gaps it .70 and fills me as a buyer .70 away since I had a limit order below to buy. NASDAQ would fill you at your price and than gap .70 to fill the large order.

while the nyse does offer the ability of price improvement, you can also get filled on the other side of that print if you market in at the wrong time.. ever get "spreaded"? no single market maker is able to "gap" a nasdaq stock.. on the NYSE the specialist is given an order for 80k shares.. if he decides to print all 80k in a single print he sweeps all of the orders in his book until he has the full 80k and then makes a single print for all orders in his book at the price least favorable to the big block.. on the nasdaq, a market maker is given an order for 80k.. since the nasdaq is fragmented, he does not know at what price he will be able to acquire 80k shares.. so, being careful not to run the price up on himself, he begins acquiring shares slowly at the market.. when he has the full 80k, he then prints a block trade for 80k at an average(or negotiated) price plus whatever markup..

Originally posted by Don Bright
Sorry guys...I have to jump in on this one...

Since most OTC stocks are less liquid (except for the nifty fifty), then it would be MORE advantageous to the seller if he could have the opportunity to negotiate a price with a single entity. So both sides get better fills.
actually, a seller can call gsco or msco who will negotiate a large print for them.. the difference being that the nasdaq market maker isnt going to slap the market down .70 to fill the order.. he is going to take his time(he isnt responsible for every share traded in the stock) and get the best price.. plus i would like to point out that the orders in the specialists book do not represent the entire market for a nyse stock.. there are always people waiting in the wings for their opportunity to get in and out of a stock.. so with the naz, there is more opportunity to feel around and get a better price.. think about it this way.. if the nyse block trade system were really efficient for the person buying or selling the block, then why would the stocks price move back up near its previous level right after printing the block?

Originally posted by Don Bright
Now...since Level 2 has become pretty much just a tool to fool the uniitiated into believing what they learned in some silly "trading academy" and to put credence in the quotes is ridiculous since many MM's simply fade.
level 2 is not quite so useless.. but you cant rely on idiotic "if the colors are moving counter clockwise, then buy" nonsense.. it takes time and experience to learn how to read it.. btw don.. (and i know you already know this, but just forgot) market makers are not allowed to back away from quotes with supersoes.. so you can rely on the sizes that are displayed

Originally posted by rtharp
Market makers will also take huge trades but very few will do it on the inside bid/ask. I'm not talking about 5000 shares . I'm referring to 200,000 shares plus. I see it all the time on the NASDAQ market too when a fund needs to get out in a hurry they will get executed but away from theinside bid /ask. On NASDAQ a trader can't participate in that. On the NYSE I can.

actually, a nasdaq trader is able to participate in the 200k plus prints.. on the nyse, the specialist combines all of the smaller orders on his book and consolidates everything to a single large print.. on the nasdaq, the market maker first acquires the shares in the market in small pieces.. once he has the needed amount, he then prints the block to the buyer/seller.. so you are able to participate, but in the smaller pieces, rather than in the large block..

Originally posted by rtharp
Don had a good point too. If a huge order of 50,000 shares plus were to hit bids it wouldn't send the market down .70 It would probably go down $2.00.
lol.. 2 bucks on 50k? which illiquid stock are you referring to? there are stocks on the nasdaq that trade millions of shares a day and dont even move a dollar..

the nyse does have many advantages but i cant help but feel after reading this thread that its benefits might have been slightly exaggerated.. you wont get significant "price improvement" on every trade with the nyse.. and its not impossible to participate in block prints on the nasdaq.. anyway, i thought i would throw in my own .02 in defense of the naz..

-qwik
 
My personal experience with using NX orders is that while they usually result in close to instant fills, if the specialist is showing stock available but there is not actually any there, using an NX order will just result in the quote being updated. Also they often will just show a 1X1 which as I understand it means they have no obligation to fill you. All of the details are listed at the NYSE web site.

DarynC
 
Originally posted by DATTrader


I am intrigued by the concept you are discussing related to price improvement on NYSE when big orders come thru. This is very interesting to learn about and I am trying to distinguish in my minds eye the mechanical differences of how the OTC market works compared to the exchanges. I suppose I really do need to learn more about how the specialist system works.

However I do have to say that I trade Naz exclusively (currently) and the stocks I trade-even thinner stocks in the Naz 100-would not move $2.00 on 50,000 shares as Don first suggested. In fact I see more and more a MM (or more often INCA) throw serious size (25k and more) at the inside price and print it (in many smaller lots) and the stock holds or moves the other way! While I am sure that 50,000 shares would move a small stock much more, as Don said it would likely do the same on NYSE would it not?

Don't be fooled by negotiated MM trades or Institution trades that "print" on Inca (other ECN's too, but Inca especially). Remember what INCA stands for (Instinet or "Institutional Network")...and they put up their own trades between firms (at way to high a cost, but that's another story).
 
Originally posted by TickRader
Can you tell me what NYSE stocks you are doing this with and what routes do you use?


I've traded a few different stocks. Since I am now doing arbitrage with some indexes and such I would prefer to not disclose what I am trading (more traders doing arbitrage means less opportunity for me)

I have traded DIS, F , MO, CCU, IBM, LU, AK, and a few others.
Robert Tharp
 
Originally posted by DarynC
My personal experience with using NX orders is that while they usually result in close to instant fills, if the specialist is showing stock available but there is not actually any there, using an NX order will just result in the quote being updated. Also they often will just show a 1X1 which as I understand it means they have no obligation to fill you. All of the details are listed at the NYSE web site.

DarynC


Different specialist do differnt things. This is where knowing how a specialists handles orders like NX come into play. I know a few who do exactly what you say. I also have played with a lot of others who show 1x1 but I can hit him with 2000 shares and he will give me all of them.
 
Originally posted by NvrSettLe
Hey Rtharp,
This NYSE+ you are referring to is that the Limit NX function. I was wondering if anyone has used the limit nx function and if so what is your opinion. I have just been introduced to it. The way it was described to me was, if you want to get filled at the inside market for less that 1K shares you can be instantly filled by sending a limit nx order. If there is stock available at that price level you will be filled instantly. I was wondering if this is available for all stocks. I would like to hear peoples feedback and any information you may have about this option.
Thanks

All NYSE stocks now have it. FRE seems to have found a way to ignore it though as per my experience with him. Some stocks it's great with the instant fills and there are times I can get a lot more than the 100 lot they sometimes show. It depends on the stock/specialist how they choose to fill them. It has made NYSE trading much easier--but quite a few specialist have stopped showing size. Decimals also hurt as lots of traders will penny the specialist with a 100 lot so we have a hard time knowing what the true depth of the market is.

Robert Tharp
 
Back
Top