Prop Shops That Pay You To Trade?

Quote from RunTrade:

very good post. but the pro-athletes metaphor may be pushing it a bit. yes there are more, but the demand and desire for one (pros) is quite a bit higher than that of trading as a living.


~RT

there are more brain surgens than astronauts.:cool:

I don't know about this. I think at the collegiate level maybe. But not for people over the age of 22. I can't tell you how many people out there, doctors, lawyers, pilots, you name it, that trade on the side hoping to make enough money so they can quit their jobs and do this full time. I'm not just talking about the number of guys that sit at home in their pajamas all day watching Oprah and trading in their IB account, I'm talking about the guy that is in sales that works at a cubicle and tries to manage his swing trades on the side.

Just look at the late night infomercials and tell me there are not hundreds of thousands of people out there trying to do this full time and make a living at it. I don't know many 28 year old guys with beer guts that are trying to make the Bears practice squad. LOL.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Edge. I usually put edge into three categories. One is capturing a spread such as a market maker on the floor for options. Where he can buy on the bid and sell on the ask and capture the difference. This is an edge because we can't do this and he can. Therefore he has an advantage over screen traders.

Second edge is technology. Being able to execute faster then everyone else. Or being able to do arbitrage baskets or complex orders using sophisticated algorithms. This is an edge because again, if everyone doesn't have the ability to do this, they are at a disadvantage to you.

Third edge is order flow info. Again, this applies to guys on the floor or guys working OTC desks where they can see large orders and see where the market is going. You don't have this edge and they do.

An edge is something that usually cannot be replicated by other traders, hence an advantage.

This is why I laugh when people refer to TA as an edge. Any moron with tradestation can optimize moving averages all day long and can come up with the pattern of the month that everyone seems to be keying off of. That is not edge if everyone can do it. Most futures traders don't have an edge. They are trading on feel and gut. There is nothing wrong with this, its just not an edge.
Actually, the best edge is an edge that doesn't fit into those three categories. Coming up with an edge nobody else has thought of is the best one of all.
 
Quote from newbunch:

Actually, the best edge is an edge that doesn't fit into those three categories. Coming up with an edge nobody else has thought of is the best one of all.

That is not what I was referring to. Edge doesn't have to do with strategy but rather structure.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Edge. I usually put edge into three categories. One is capturing a spread such as a market maker on the floor for options. Where he can buy on the bid and sell on the ask and capture the difference. This is an edge because we can't do this and he can. Therefore he has an advantage over screen traders.

Second edge is technology. Being able to execute faster then everyone else. Or being able to do arbitrage baskets or complex orders using sophisticated algorithms. This is an edge because again, if everyone doesn't have the ability to do this, they are at a disadvantage to you.

Third edge is order flow info. Again, this applies to guys on the floor or guys working OTC desks where they can see large orders and see where the market is going. You don't have this edge and they do.

An edge is something that usually cannot be replicated by other traders, hence an advantage.

This is why I laugh when people refer to TA as an edge. Any moron with tradestation can optimize moving averages all day long and can come up with the pattern of the month that everyone seems to be keying off of. That is not edge if everyone can do it. Most futures traders don't have an edge. They are trading on feel and gut. There is nothing wrong with this, its just not an edge.

You nailed it, Mav.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

That is not what I was referring to. Edge doesn't have to do with strategy but rather structure.

Heck, last I read it was all just simple "reversion to the mean" - how hard can that possibly be? LOL (just screwing with you)...

And, some of your posts are so darn depressing that I think you better come to Vegas for some much needed R&R. Hang out with some guys who make some money (we have the other 2% of all the people in the world who make money, LOL).


Don
:D
 
Stay away from the prop shops. Thankfully, most of these shady operations went bust back in the meltdown of 2000. A few others, like Datek, went on to become reputable institutions. However, they are the exception rather than the rule. Most of these shops are more interested in squeezing you for commissions than in teaching you to trade or even to see you profit from your trading. As long as you have enough to pay their commissions, they don't care how well you do.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

That is not what I was referring to. Edge doesn't have to do with strategy but rather structure.

Can't say I agree with that...care to expand? Are you applying this to equities?
 
Quote from Dustin:

Can't say I agree with that...care to expand? Are you applying this to equities?

Me thinks he equates a real edge more to a gimmick rather than edge as great discipline, money management & a unique programable strategy. Which is what I tend to believe also.
Like bullets were a huge edge, before they spread out.
SOES bandits had a big exploitable edge. Direct instant access to CHX, PHLX, CIN & BSX on NYSE stocks was a great edge. Restricted participation which create low competition markets, that's an edge. Being on the floor is a humongous edge. Getting a read on the specialist and human tendencies is kind of an edge.
Barriers to entry, that is what it's all about. Business empires were built on this.

I do think it's funny how Maverick rags on futures prop firms, when the equity side ones have not been able to afford real prop deals for years. Only true equity prop firms are Schonfeld and FNYS. And only FNYS can afford to pay salary and is extremely selective, plus they are above the in & out daytrading.
Meanwhile the futures firms will only do real prop deals and pay a salary/draw. So there must be something about futures, and I do believe there are still some barriers.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

I'm going to say something that might offend a lot of people on here. But to be honest with you, I really don't care. The fact of the matter is, I can count on one hand how many profitable futures traders I have heard of. Not guys that I know, but guys that I have heard of from other prop firms. While it may be true that only 10% of traders in general are able to eek out a living, I think that number drops to about 2% when we talk about pure outright futures traders.

Now having said that, why should a firm put up their risk capital to get behind a guy where there is a one out of fifty chance he will ever makes a dime? I certainly would not make that bet nor would anyone on this board. This is the problem we are faced with.

If you want a salary job as a trader, let me put you in a few directions. One is risk arbitrage with a major bank or hedge fund. Another is automated trading/writing algorithms, etc. for a major bank or hedge fund, the other is a sales trader on an OTC desk for a major bank.

I'm sorry to report this, but there simply is very little out there in the way of salary for discretionary, fly by the seat of your pants/cowboy, futures traders, and for good reason. You have no EDGE!

My best advice I can give is put a good resume together, start faxing it out to every firm you can think of, brush up on your statistics and probability skills, and hit the pavement.

I was fortunate enough to attend a lecture just last week at the downtown campus of IIT here in Chicago. They happen to have an outstanding trading curriculum there. The keynote speaker is one of the professors there who happens to be one of the brightest guys I have ever met, a former quant from Bell Labs.

He has traded OTC products for Morgan Stanley in NY, ran one of the largest bond options desk in London and currently has started his own firm. He gave a rundown of the current job market here in Chicago for traders. He said there was a plethora of opportunity out there for bright young guys that can write code and algorithms, and guys that can do advanced derivative pricing for large banks and hedge funds.

He has placed several of his students with many of these banks and firms. But outside that area, there is very very little available. Unfortunately, if you don't have these credentials, you are going to have to pay to play. You are going to have to take risks and make sacrifices. You are going to have to PROVE yourself with YOUR money. IF, and this is a huge IF, you somehow find a way to make a little bit of money, then, and only then, will a few doors SLOWLY start to open up for you in terms of getting backing of some sort.

Again, I know this is not what people want to hear on this thread, but it is very real. I cannot believe for the life of me how many guys on this web site come to me or others asking for money with their hands out with not a single shred of a track record or any evidence that there is a remote chance that they will ever make a dime.

I don't know who to blame for this, late night infomercials, Trader Monthly Magazine, or possibly all the misinformation on this site by guys who claim they make millions yet don't even have a real account opened. Either way, there are more professional athletes today then there are profitable independent traders.

Many of you would have better luck hitting the gym and trying out for the Chicago Bears practice squad. Flame me all you want, but if you don't believe me, I can give you names and phone numbers of all the shops here in town and you can see for yourself.

This might be true in Chicago and NA, but there is a number of Prop shops in UK and across europe that offer a base salary, most of them trade STIRs I guess spread trading ( I don't really understand it if someone would care to explain would greatly appreciate), seems like its risk free. I went for an interview to one of these shops and the HR person told me they have 90% sucess rate. I figured they must have some edge if they can offer base and put you on a simulator for 6 months. One that comes to mind is OSTC they adverstise a 12k pounds/year sallary.



Mike
 
Back
Top