I would be concerned for two reasons. First, Schoney is correct in the way he interprets the regs. There is a federal reserve memo that is clear that if you are taking 100% of profits and losses then you should be treated like a customer and meet reg T. In the extreme, there is one school of thought that if you are a prop trader you are not supposed to take any losses. If you are advantaging yourself of net capital then the firm is responsible for the losses not the trader. However, the regional exchanges that most prop firms are members of have interpretted the fact that you are an investor in an LLC and are therefore subject to risk and losses so it is ok to be allocated a loss from trading.
Second, I heard from a good source based in a southern state that Steve is the one pressuring the SEC and other SRO's to give him a no action letter or force the other prop shops to change the way they do business. He wants to put all the other shops out of business because he knows that Bright, Carlin, Echo will not take a traders loss.
If I were still a prop trader I would be concerned.