Originally posted by showtime23
I heard that as a college student who starts off with a prop trading firm, it would be more difficult for that person to get a job in another financial position such as asset management, financial analysis, IB, if that said person failed as a trader and that straight out of college students are preffered, but it is said that one could always go to a prop firm after experience in a.m, ib, etc. Any truth to this?
Originally posted by cashonly
Makes sense to me. If you did a good job at a prop firm, you would still be there making money, increasing your size and profits. Why would you want to go somewhere else. If you were leaving, to get a "job", it probably means you couldn't make it as a trader, so why would someone want to hire you if you've proven that you can't do the job?
On the other hand, CEO's who bankrupt companies quite often seem to get a job as a CEO at other firms.![]()
Originally posted by canuck
a comment on the ceo note. Yes a CEO has a very demanding job. But at least they have the security of knowing they will make 6 mil per year, and if they get fired they get 3 times their salary plus the stock they own (if it's still worth anything). A trader can work 60 hours a week studying the market and lose money. The pressure is intense for both, but in different ways.
You know, i've never really thought of trading as a job, like a lawyer or doctor. There, the more hours you work the more you make. Trading is more like competitive sports, such as golf. Everyone works hard, but not everyone plays like Tiger (who happens to work harder than everyone else, it seems). And there are lots of good golfers not making any money....
canuck