Proof that volatility has no correlation to options prices!

No chance the troll is clever enough to discuss

Proof that volatility has no correlation to options prices

Numnut most likely meant to illustrate that Price has no correlation to Volatilty..... Right up there with his discovery that Short puts is a bearish play





im right.
 
@wxytrader A word of advice: When smart people talk it is better to listen. When they specifically point to something you might be missing in your knowledge, go and learn it as you could have been wrong all along. They are not trying to point out that you are not smart, but the fact that they have experience and knowledge to give you a path so you don't lose your 2008 low end Lambo.
 
@wxytrader A word of advice: When smart people talk it is better to listen. When they specifically point to something you might be missing in your knowledge, go and learn it as you could have been wrong all along. They are not trying to point out that you are not smart, but the fact that they have experience and knowledge to give you a path so you don't lose your 2008 low end Lambo.

What are you talking about? First of all being smart and making money in stocks are completely irrelevant...in fact I think being too smart can be a hindrance. Let's not forget all the options knowledge on this site doesn't matter...the only thing that matters is PnL.
 
He does not understand what the word "proof" means. He thinks ONE instance of something is proof. The most rudimentary reasoning error, existential universalization. A 6th grader knows this intuitively.

OP consider: How one uses their words correlates to their intelligence, integrity, and self-worth. Also acts as a filer of who will engage with you.
 
Hes a troll, in a no harm,no foul sort of way..Hes always pretty respectful,but has zero interest in learning...or trading ..





He does not understand what the word "proof" means. He thinks ONE instance of something is proof. The most rudimentary reasoning error, existential universalization. A 6th grader knows this intuitively.

OP consider: How one uses their words correlates to their intelligence, integrity, and self-worth. Also acts as a filer of who will engage with you.
 
He does not understand what the word "proof" means. He thinks ONE instance of something is proof. The most rudimentary reasoning error, existential universalization. A 6th grader knows this intuitively.

OP consider: How one uses their words correlates to their intelligence, integrity, and self-worth. Also acts as a filer of who will engage with you.

I thought we resolved the matter?????
Slow day on ET I guess. :)
 
Back
Top