Project Veritas takes down the holy grail of news media. The NY Times.

[gwb-trading]

So the personal opinions of some random low level employee reflects on the NYT as a news organization as reported by a criminal sexual harasser who is being funded by Trump who is actually worse than Okeefe.

The problem is of credibility, for you guys to say NYT should have stringent standards for menial low level jobs, where were these standards when Trump was voted in by 60 million right wingers for the highest job in the country?

The New York Times has a dismal history in the last two decades of poor hiring, retracted stories, and integrity failures (e.g. see Jayson Blair). The reputation of the "gray lady" is quickly sinking and this latest disclosure will not help the least.

Trump was voted in partially due to the lack of trust of the majority of Americans in MSM outlets such as the NY Times. The Times brought this problem on themselves. They also effectively helped land Trump in the Presidency due to the paper's continual integrity issues and deliberate bias.

 

[exGOPer]

The New York Times has a dismal history in the last two decades of poor hiring, retracted stories, and integrity failures (e.g. see Jayson Blair). The reputation of the "gray lady" is quickly sinking and this latest disclosure will not help the least.

Trump was voted in partially due to the lack of trust of the majority of Americans in MSM outlets such as the NY Times. The Times brought this problem on themselves. They also effectively helped land Trump in the Presidency due to the paper's continual integrity issues and deliberate bias.

Every large scale organization will have that problem, you cited nothing out of the ordinary.

Trump was voted in mainly because media organizations like NYT made a false equivalence, promoting nothingburger like the email story while ignoring policy distinction as Trump voters were fed fake news by Russians is why the clown is talking about doing IQ tests while absolutely nothing gets done.

 

[peilthetraveler]

Oh no, some random low level employee made insensitive vulgar comments

That's unacceptable!

But the same is OK if that random employee is the President and leader of the Conservative moral values party - then he can be as vulgar and insensitive as he wants.

Just so you can thoroughly understand, how after over a year, you're still brainwashed to believe CNN that Trump mocked a reporter based on his appearance, I will leave you with this.

So unless presidents of banks, military generals and Ted Cruz all have the same disability, you have to admit, you got conned by CNN into believing their narrative.

 

[exGOPer]

Just so you can thoroughly understand, how after over a year, you're still brainwashed to believe CNN that Trump mocked a reporter based on his appearance, I will leave you with this.

So unless presidents of banks, military generals and Ted Cruz all have the same disability, you have to admit, you got conned by CNN into believing their narrative.

Right, he wasn't mocking the handicap guy at all.

Even with your carefully edited video, at no place did he mock others the way he mocked that handicapped reporter.

 

[gwb-trading]

Right, he wasn't mocking the handicap guy at all.

Even with your carefully edited video, at no place did he mock others the way he mocked that handicapped reporter.

I can't believe that reporter is mocking Trump.

 

[peilthetraveler]

Right, he wasn't mocking the handicap guy at all.

Even with your carefully edited video, at no place did he mock others the way he mocked that handicapped reporter.

He mocked a reporter, but not for being handicapped. Big difference. He mocked him for being an idiot.

The mental gymnastics you are pulling are truly amazing.

 

[futurecurrents]

Hahahahahha

Random blurbs by an 'Audience Strategy Editor' (wtf does that mean) = NYT going down

Hahahhahahhahahah

You Cons are hilarious, i will give you that.

PS: I looked up his job title

"The editor will help set strategy and manage execution of audience development across the video desk. "

https://www.glassdoor.co.in/job-lis...E25,39.htm?jl=2505645500&countryRedirect=true

So a video editor is a NYTimes editor and his personal opinions will bring down NYT.

I can't stop laughing.

The sad thing is that the right wingers don't know or don't care about the truth. All they need is a headline. With simple words.

 

[futurecurrents]

The New York Times has a dismal history in the last two decades of poor hiring, retracted stories, and integrity failures (e.g. see Jayson Blair). The reputation of the "gray lady" is quickly sinking and this latest disclosure will not help the least.

Trump was voted in partially due to the lack of trust of the majority of Americans in MSM outlets such as the NY Times. The Times brought this problem on themselves. They also effectively helped land Trump in the Presidency due to the paper's continual integrity issues and deliberate bias.

And still it is the best paper in the nation and conservatives are morons for ignoring it.

 

[gwb-trading]

And still it is the best paper in the nation and conservatives are morons for ignoring it.

Conservatives don't ignore it.... they regularly point out all the incorrect information and bias found in the NY Times.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Howz the New Crock Times coming along on that investigative story of the affair that John McCain allegedly had with a consultant? You know. The one they put on the front page of the NYT a couple days after he announced his candidacy or after he got the nomination- I can't remember which. Oh that's right it never went anywhere. I am pretty sure they retracted it somewhere- maybe in the real estate section of the sunday paper or in an enclosed Home Depot flyer or something.