nobody has any concept of doing with less. They don't teach it in college, they never talk about it on tv. Everybody needs more and more growth to survive. Yet this is not the way we really live our personal lives. We have enough kids and then that is enough. A dog, a cat and maybe a bird and then we say, "Enough growth", we get a house big enough, but we don't keep building bigger and bigger houses. Yes some do, but that is not normal. Yet when it comes to the economy the only thing anybody knows is more and more, So like I said, I want my government to be pro growth, but I want my fellow citizens to be anti growth like me. Not really anti growth, just questioning if more growth is actually better. And more importantly questioning what the future would be like if we constantly got by on less and lessQuote from trefoil:
I've said this before but:
1 - NJ, where I live, has already shown how you can have a progressive consumption tax: the sales tax here excludes food, clothing and medicine: the stuff you need to live, in other words, and the stuff the poor spend most of their money on. Simple, efficient.
2 - Huh? Can you explain "the government should be pro growth, but I am personally anti growth, so it makes for an interesting mind if you like things befuddled."? Just so's that I have it for future reference, if you don't mind...
