ProfLogic's Method

[ProfLogic]

Quote from palinuro:

Could you post that trade? I don't see it on my chart, at least following the ruleset.

- palinuro

The trade began to setting up on the 16807 (822.25 Prime Trading PPF toward target 812.25 Prime Trading Breach). The problem was that it was so slow playing out I fudged and moved my Trading Decisions to the 2401 (822.25 Prime Trading PPF toward target 812.25 Prime Trading Breach).

What started as a slow trade progressed to a quicker trade so I had to take a quicker exit. Not typical from a New Traders standpoint but I've done this for 15 years so I can take a few liberties. I'm rather good at reading price.

Its like when you fist get your drivers license, you ridgedly follow the rules. By the time you have driven for a few years you are rolling through stop signs, speeding on the interstate and talking on the cell phone while in bumper to bumper traffic.

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from Blue_Ice:

This is your third/fourth attempt to deviate the course of this thread. Unsuccessfully i might add.

What's with the useless need of verification?

The validity/efficiency/usefulness of Proflogic's method is there (by the number of people admittedly using parts/all the system on their daily trading) whether it is validated according to your "cough" "standards" "cough" or not.

Your vigilante attitude is childish and unnecessary. If you think you're saving thousands of new traders from the villain hands of Proflogic and his method then i'd send you a medal. Problem is that real mail needs real addresses and cannot deliver to your current location in fantasy land.

Why don't you put all posters on this thread and the whole thread on your ignore list??

The few posters that have not included you in their ignore list already would follow suit and put your name in their ignore list as well.

That would be a great feeling for everyone involved!!! Including you!!

Seriously, give it a shot!!

BI

There's a strange coincidence with flamers showing up as soon as page views start decreasing in number. :eek:

 

[Sushi]

Ok professor. It still makes no sense why you or other practioners will not submit to any outside verification of the method. Sorry you don't see it that way but tate a fact. If method works you can only gain.

 

[Whisky]

Quote from Sushi:

Ok professor. It still makes no sense why you or other practioners will not submit to any outside verification of the method. Sorry you don't see it that way but tate a fact. If method works you can only gain.

Gain what?. I'd rather have not anyone else read this thread or approximate anything of how I particularly use it. You must be the stupidest earthling in the universe, but you get an A+ for persistence.

JW

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from Sushi:

Ok professor. It still makes no sense why you or other practioners will not submit to any outside verification of the method. Sorry you don't see it that way but tate a fact. If method works you can only gain.

Sorry, I don't gain if it works for you, you do. It already works for me and the information is free in this thread. This is what makes no sense to you.
How or why would someone give something away for free that has any value . . . because I CAN!

 

[dominict70]

I totally agree with what Prof said. The method works although i just been using it for the past month. The key is patient to wait for the setup!!!

 

[palinuro]

Quote from ProfLogic:

The trade began to setting up on the 16807 (822.25 Prime Trading PPF toward target 812.25 Prime Trading Breach). The problem was that it was so slow playing out I fudged and moved my Trading Decisions to the 2401 (822.25 Prime Trading PPF toward target 812.25 Prime Trading Breach).

What started as a slow trade progressed to a quicker trade so I had to take a quicker exit. Not typical from a New Traders standpoint but I've done this for 15 years so I can take a few liberties. I'm rather good at reading price.

Its like when you fist get your drivers license, you ridgedly follow the rules. By the time you have driven for a few years you are rolling through stop signs, speeding on the interstate and talking on the cell phone while in bumper to bumper traffic.

Thanks Bill. I got into that trade but washed out in the chop. Did much better with the 1:00 and the 3:47 shorts - thought seriously of holding the last trade overnight, but that would have been breaking a rule...

When you talk about automating the process, do you mean full automation or automating alerts, with the trade being handled manually?

- palinuro

 

[Insearch]

Quote from ProfLogic:

The trade began to setting up on the 16807 (822.25 Prime Trading PPF toward target 812.25 Prime Trading Breach). The problem was that it was so slow playing out I fudged and moved my Trading Decisions to the 2401 (822.25 Prime Trading PPF toward target 812.25 Prime Trading Breach).

I'm probably missing something . . . in today's 16807 chart, starting 9:30 EST, I only had Breach HH 821.75 followed by PPF HL 811, then a Breach HH 825.25 then a PPF HL 811.75 . . .

Prof/anyone, could you clarify?

 

[Insearch]

Quote from palinuro:

Thanks Bill. I got into that trade but washed out in the chop. Did much better with the 1:00 and the 3:47 shorts - thought seriously of holding the last trade overnight, but that would have been breaking a rule...

When you talk about automating the process, do you mean full automation or automating alerts, with the trade being handled manually?

- palinuro

Those shorts are on the 16807? 1:00pm EST was a Breach HH 825.25, no? The 3:47pm one was PPF LH but towards PPF HL 811.75? Also histo didn't seem to be in prime and was below zero anyway . . . Is there something wrong with my charts?

 

[ProfLogic]

Quote from Insearch:

I'm probably missing something . . . in today's 16807 chart, starting 9:30 EST, I only had Breach HH 821.75 followed by PPF HL 811, then a Breach HH 825.25 then a PPF HL 811.75 . . .

Prof/anyone, could you clarify?

This was from a couple days ago.