Ever wonder why us retails that traded directional are winning since Feb? I don't think it has anything to do with skills:
{Graph of S&P climb Feb-->Aug}
Until we can figure out how to profitably trade non directional, we will always be at the mercy of the market.
Personally, I think (as a community) that traders of all stripes have to quit thinking of "The Market" as a fixed regime, but more as a slow-moving weather system that, 6 months from now, may present a different trader-facing climate than had been seen in the prior 5-10 years.
Not to hijack the thread or anything, but when a daily ATR pops from 15-20 to 25-30, but IV maintains in a 9.0-12.0 neighborhood, and IV<HV on regular occasion, it will just suck to be an option seller.


So, despite solid performance for the past 5 years, I'm looking to long/short momentum trades in the market -- equities and the U.S. indices -- via old standards like ADX and even MACD. [Nice paper results; and "green" so far in toe-dipping current trades. Historically, 7-10 day holds were profitable, 2-3 day holds were for losses. Interestingly, the look-back parameters (in both the ADX and the MACD) are rather consistent for the indices, but appear quite unique by equity. "Huh!" My working explanation is that there is one regime trading the indices, while a different regime is trading
each of the equities.]
Tick-scalping used to work -- then it stopped. Momentum trades used to work, but then I started (seriously) in option credit spreads, and I lost simply track. Options (credit spreads) have worked well, but now, *not* so well. Right now, momentum trades look very good. (And to be fair, tick-scalping conditions look *much* better than for years.)
The takeaway?
Have multiple techniques available; have objective measures for when to trade each technique; be flexible and responsible in your immediate market outlook, and do not plant what the market *tells* you will be a hard grow.