Profit from market neutral options writing - possible or not?

Quote from makloda:

Sure, you will have 15 years in a row where you make 13% and one year where you're down 75%.

Again, the risk adjusted returns are not better than going long SPY and simply holding for 16 years and reinvesting dividends.

back test it over the last 15 years and get back to me.
 
Quote from vhehn:

as a risk its exactly the same.

You are trying to play on words now. That's fine, I have no intention to continue to belabor the point. You are appearing to back away from your original statement now and the intent of the message which was that there is no material difference between the two strategies. Obviously you have corrected your thinking now and agree with me that the two are not the same and over the long run, selling naked puts and calls vs trading the stock is far inferior on a risk adjusted basis.
 
Quote from vhehn:

this guy has one of the best records in managed money. he sells options.
selling puts is no more risky than owning stock. selling calls is no more risky than shorting stock.

http://www.ansbacherusa.com/files/optionstrader0106article.pdf

Have you been paying attention? Max Ansbacher has been trying his luck with delta-hedging short index puts, apparently with the very naive belief that the skew represents an opportunity. Accordingly he has not done very well in the last two years. He is down over 10% YTD.

Hint: To see why the implied volatility skew likely does not represent a trading opportunity, for each strike K, calculate the cash flow from delta-hedging a put over the last X days for an option expiring in X days, then solve for the volatility where the sum of the daily cash flows is zero at expiry. Calculate the slope of the skew and overlay on the strip from the current ATM volatility that expires in X days. Ponder why the slope of the "fair" skew is slightly different than the observed implied volatility skew, then remember certain events in the late 1980s, and further consider transaction costs if they were not included in the delta-hedging simulation.
 
Ansbacher's fund produced (net of fees) over the period of 1996-April 2008

Annualized Return 11.78%
Annualized StdDev 19.88%

according to www.iasg.com

That's a Sharpe < 0.5. Worth all the hassle and risk? You decide.
 
Quote from segv:



Hint: To see why the implied volatility skew likely does not represent a trading opportunity, for each strike K, calculate the cash flow from delta-hedging a put over the last X days for an option expiring in X days, then solve for the volatility where the sum of the daily cash flows is zero at expiry. Calculate the slope of the skew and overlay on the strip from the current ATM volatility that expires in X days. Ponder why the slope of the "fair" skew is slightly different than the observed implied volatility skew, then remember certain events in the late 1980s, and further consider transaction costs if they were not included in the delta-hedging simulation.

yeah.... what he said...
 
Back
Top