Probability and Trading

In my own case, there is not much wait. I generally get 20 trades a day. I am too exhausted to trade all of them. The trading day lasts 14.5 hours. I trade 3 min charts. That is 290 bars a day.

The pattern I described is called 3 push pattern (also called 'wedge') as discussed by Al Brooks in his books. There is not always a climax. The pattern reverses sometimes with leg count. The probability issue in that case is slightly complicated since the previous trend can go for one more leg before a reversal. This can take out the SL. It will force one to re-enter after that 4th push. Further, if there is a channel forming in the previous direction, this pattern builds within a lower time frame and you then have to trade intuitively.

In my original post, the discussion about probability is not specific to this trade. So, I did not delve into the specifics earlier.
If you don't have trouble waiting for your setups then you have the world by the shorties.
Break a leg!
 
Okay, now let us extend this further. What if I say that a trend has climaxed in one direction on a given time frame and I take a trade after the signal bar on the opposite side formed. assume, my stoploss is the previous climax and my target is twice that distance. Now, is the probability skewed in my favor? What could be the odds?

You get to figure that out. No one here will answer that question for you.
 
Let me take a simpler example.

Suppose, there is a trend in a specific direction, say in a higher time frame like daily and I take a with trend-trade once every time the scrip touches 20 ema on hourly. I use reasonable SL and 3 times the target. What are the odds?

Are you asking these questions because you want someone else to crunch the data and figure it out for you? Or are you asking how these things are figured out? Figuring it out is fairly straight forward if you have the data and some coding/math skills. You will have to better define the question, of course. Lots of detail has been left out in your questions.
 
???:confused:o_O
Asking these questions means you want someone else to do work for you "sava".

Let's say someone says odds are X, what good is that to you? Did they test for it or is it just a hunch?

Do they know you, your trading style, size of your account, your real risk tolerance, etc?
 
Are you asking these questions because you want someone else to crunch the data and figure it out for you? Or are you asking how these things are figured out? Figuring it out is fairly straight forward if you have the data and some coding/math skills. You will have to better define the question, of course. Lots of detail has been left out in your questions.
I am just triggering a discussion. I am a successful trader myself.
If you think you need further details, please ask.
 
Last edited:
Then I think the discussion can be summed up like this: Any set of conditions you can imagine can be tested to see how they historically performed in the market. This is commonly done but rarely done for the benefit of others.
 
Asking these questions means you want someone else to do work for you "sava".

Let's say someone says odds are X, what good is that to you? Did they test for it or is it just a hunch?

Do they know you, your trading style, size of your account, your real risk tolerance, etc?


On this internet forum you do not know others and you still chat with them. Like, for example, you are now talking to me.
 
Okay, now let us extend this further. What if I say that a trend has climaxed in one direction on a given time frame and I take a trade after the signal bar on the opposite side formed. assume, my stoploss is the previous climax and my target is twice that distance. Now, is the probability skewed in my favor? What could be the odds?
"Setups" do not form in a vacuum which is why you have to test your own signals given your understanding of the context in which they occur. Bulkowski's stats are meaningless without that context. Before a trader has a chance to put the odds in his or her favor, and yes a skilled and disciplined has the odds in favor, the trader has to fully understand price behavior. There are sources where you can learn what to look for and what they may look like but there is no substitute for the experience of extensive observation of price development and subsequent testing.
 
Let us now look at it from another dimension.
Mathematics has an interesting topic called 'Chaos Theory' which evolved in the last 3 decades and is still evolving.

Most engineering kind of math is linear. Chaos is non-linear math it talks about random events/variables and is applied to events in nature/society/stock markets etc.

Most of us look at charts in a linear fashion. Like, say for example, we are looking at them from a time frame perspective. But those charts are not dependent on time and so a linear math formula cannot be derived. That drives us to the concept of probability. That's why we draw trend lines and trend channel lines etc. as we assume the distribution of data to be in that range.

With further development in artificial intelligence, the applications of chaos theory can advance further to throw new perspective on stock markets. Then we can see a paradigm shift in our charting methods.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top