perhaps I will start other thread in order to have an organization in my trading process
But you started this in mid March. You're already onto forward testing? I mean...what...hmm... just four weeks and back testing done! Huh! What! ... Liar...So far, and taking into account the results given by the Backtesting, I will pass to start the forwardtesting process ... perhaps I will start other thread in order to have an organization in my trading process

First off, I rather just sit there for 75 minutes then go back to sleep than be in the market at all. It is safe to be out of the market-no risk, my style of day trading is like this, if I am not going to be profitable pretty quick after I get in, I want to be out. I generally have use 3 to 3.35 bars up to dailies where that changes, but think it just a matter of one's back testing and having enough occurrences and different market volatility, like 2008 is way different than right now as far as structure and yet would not change 3 bar time rule cause I looked at past several years before to find out when a trade should falter. I prefer to trade when market is more controlled by the big boys and they don't trade when bars get real big, so I like controlled chaos. You can't get out well on huge ranging one minute bars, like twenty point one minute bar.Something else about the above post with regard to the number of "bars" in a RET and the amount of time it takes to resume its stride. Some gurus say that the RET shouldn't be more than three bars, but of course this depends entirely on the bar interval: three minutes? three hours?
The message to be taken away, tho, is that the RET shouldn't be too deep and it shouldn't take too long. Why? Because of what a RET represents. And if it's too deep and/or it takes too long, perhaps buyers are thinking that perhaps this wasn't such a good idea after all and they really don't want anything to do with it.
And if they don't, why should you?
BTW, in what country do you reside? Or do I already know that?