
The indicators? None. But you are now in a position to answer your questions with data rather than opinion, whether yours or others'. I'm sure there are other, unanticipated questions which arose during the process, but this is one of the chief advantages of the process. For example, you can now determine, or begin to, the importance of the PDH and PDL, the ONH and ONL, various past swing points in various intervals and so forth. You can determine whether or not they are important only in terms of where price is most likely to stall or in terms of potential reversal levels. And though you're not interested in REVs per se right now, the RETs that occur after the REV will be of interest.
I suggest you begin by reviewing your original questions and restating them one two three. Then also list those questions that arose during your testing, such as why did price turn at that particular level and not some other? Why did a particular exit turn out to be premature? Keeping in mind that all charts are tick charts, how best can you choreograph the "views" of for example the 1m and 5m and 60m so that you are in continuous synch with the market? When for example does a swing point on the 1m become important even though it's not visible on the 5m? When can it be only acknowledged and when must it be acted upon?
When RETs are actionable has been a challenge to Dunnigan, Ross, Douglas and others, as well as Wyckoff, so you are in good company. Don't be discouraged by the puzzlement. And ask yourself periodically whether or not you are throwing virgins into the volcano. This stage is particularly fertile for drawing incorrect conclusions and setting off in the wrong direction.